Main Edition
US
FR
July 5, 2024 - 7:30am
Westminster politics has some of the highest barriers to entry of any marketplace in the world. To get elected you need a broadcast media profile, but you tend to get that on the basis of having done well in the previous two electoral cycles. On top of this, the first-past-the-post electoral system means that only the market leader in any constituency gets any reward at all. And the established big two parties have huge advantages when it comes to name recognition, constituency data and activist networks.
So for a political start-up that had struggled to get double-digit vote shares in Parliamentary by-elections to end up winning four seats at a general election, as well as securing a nationwide vote share in the mid-teens and hundreds of second places, is a stupendous achievement.
For this, Reform UK largely has Nigel Farage to thank. His fame and social media following solved the profile problem, while his political nous and flair for communication galvanised support.
That all this was done within a single month and for a party that had almost zero funding, no activist base, a tiny headquarters staff and was taken by surprise by the election timing — another rule which favours the chief incumbent — makes the feat even more astonishing.
Nobody should be tempted to believe that Reform ought to be disappointed that exit poll predictions of it scoring 13 seats did not come to pass either. For a start, the quartet of candidates it did get elected — Lee Anderson, Richard Tice and Rupert Lowe alongside Farage in Clacton — all have experience of elected office. Anderson was formerly a Tory MP, while Tice and Lowe, like Farage, are ex-MEPs. All are good media performers too. The same can almost certainly not be said for many of the nine further potential Reform parliamentarians who did not in the end make the cut.
The fact that Reform was the clear runner-up in dozens of Red Wall seats won by Labour also leaves it poised to profit as soon as Keir Starmer’s party becomes unpopular in power. And let’s face it: the Labour honeymoon is likely to be brief given all the grisly problems in the in-tray.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI look forward to Farage’s speeches in the Commons.
I think it is a great shame that Farage didn’t win more seats. But the vote share is an extraordinary performance and will make a lot of headlines in time. And this rather small bridge head does seem to be at least a very solid one, as the author says.
So my support for reform will continue and here is to a short and very unhappy honeymoon for the Labour Party and all its ministers-to-be. Leaving such a mess for Labour is probably the best thing the Conservatives have done for real conservativism in the last 14 years.
I think Patrick is right that 9 extra inexperienced MPs might have been more of a hindrance than a help. Numbers in this parliament are immaterial – 13 MPs are no more able to influence government policy than 4. It is the media game that will grow the local base that is important and here message discipline is likely to be critical. 4 well-vetted and committed MPs might be just the bridgehead required.
I agree. “Less is more” has become almost trite with overuse, but in this case, it rings true.
This is delusional. The same number of seats as the Greens, and marginally more votes than the Liberal Democrats, but a fraction of the seats. And despite everything, miles behind the Tories in both seats and votes. Historically the Right won elections by not splitting their (usually smaller) vote. Now the Right is more divided, and much less popular, than the Left, and going backwards electorally and demographically. More Short Money and media opportunities for Nigel Farage aren’t going to change that.
Not at all delusional – this article has it dead right. What matters are the voting percentages. Labour unmoved. Tory stripped away on the left to Lib Dems but more significantly on the right to Reform. One Nation Tories an endangered species. SNP goose cooked. 2029 Election will be fascinating.
I think this article has hit the nail very firmly on the head .
I think it’s a mistake to think that the Tories would necessarily appear right-wing by advocating stricter controls on immigration. In other countries the Left are now much more hawkish on that issue, because they have concluded that mass immigration doesn’t mix with social democratic policies, generous welfare states etc. There are also obvious environmental issues that stem from overdevelopment, the intensive agriculture needed to feed a larger population, and so on.
The key will be how the issue is presented. Finding a way of talking about immigration (and other similar issues) in a way that sounds fair and moderate while also advocating substantive change should be at the top of the Tories’ to-do list.
In a sane world you’d be right, but we’re not there any more. In a lot of people’s minds today immigrants are the oppressed and need protecting, no matter what they do: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/06/28/german-woman-given-harsher-sentence-than-rapist-for-calling/
The perception is created by the MSM commentary and their efforts to derogate concerns about immigration.
I note that Blair is suggesting that Starmer needs to do something about immigration. He is right because this issue will not go away. People will make their choices in the privacy and anonymity of the voting booth not in public discourse.
Some victory – split the Right, massive Labour majority and 5 years of Labour in power. World may look v different by then and he’s not getting any younger. Well done Nige.
Tories will be v angry with him and he’ll not be forgiven. Going to be a proper fight and some dirty tricks no doubt to come. Get the popcorn.
As regards being an MP – the number of seats means he won’t be getting the airtime or right to ask questions at PMQs to quite the degree some might be hoping. Similarly Broadcasters will be obliged to give Lib Dems more airtime. Plus he’ll have to make much clearer declarations of income sources and can’t be eating pigs testicles in the Jungle for £350k. He and the others will also come under much more scrutiny. We’ll see if he stands up to that. Sense is he’s a bit prickly when put under more scrutiny. And of course Reform can’t remain a ‘personality cult’ so he has to take more time to vet his candidates. They’ll have to be a major clear-out as it appears most of the ex-BNP have infiltrated!
Any Tories ‘furious’ with Farage rather than their own useless party are complete morons who can be safely ignored.
Farage Derangement Syndrome as strong as ever JW. What’s he ever done to you ? Still, perhaps someone’s working on a vaccine ? The media are going to need one.
Just stop and consider the fact that the Conservative national vote dropped from 13.6 million in 2019 and 14.0 million in 2019 to 6.8 million in 2024.
Might I suggest that it takes more than a bit of aggravation from Nigel Farage to lose half your voters ?
Note also that the total Labour vote in 2024 was down from both 2017 and 2024. Lower than even Corbyn’s worst performance.
And don’t forget one of Margaret Thatcher’s better quotes:
“I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.”
I’m sure Nigel Farage won’t have. If he ever reads your comment.
I have no doubt PB Farage a track record on ‘destruction’. As regards ‘construction’ we await. Amplifying rage with immigration an old playbook. Let’s see what happens when he’s asked more about his policies on the NHS and Social care and everything else. One trick pony, albeit I give you he’s good at that.
I would say that’s a pretty unfair characterization of Farage, even if you think that Brexit was a mistake in itself. But in politics it is whether you achieve your objectives that matters – and on these grounds Nigel Farage is certainly been a major political success.
Of course there will always be others who will not agree with those objectives, because we do not live in a utopian world where everyone agrees on those fundamental objectives. (In other words we live in a society where politics is inevitable).
The NHS isn’t only a major challenge for Reform – although no doubt they might be given a harder time on the issue than some other parties. The challenge of the ever more obviously mediocre NHS affects all parties, whose real world positions will have to evolve fast (which may need to be done so in a rather subtle, even covert way, given public attitudes). But in any case, manifesto commitments do not have to be rigidly – and sometimes cannot be – adhered to in any circumstances.
It is Labour who are in power and they might well have a big and divisive fight on their hands, especially with NHS producer interests. Wes Streeting is a smart cookie – but also the minister most likely to be scapegoated and lose office over this, perhaps a bit like Barbara Castle back in the day over Trade Union reform.
The structural problems of essentially a zero choice entirely tax funded socialist system cannot be solved simply by chucking everything more tax funding money that there is huge resistance to pay, despite the rhetoric. This can’t just be done by “taxing billionaires”.
Having said all that I think your position that demography at the moment will work against the Right is correct. How do we live in a very volatile political world as the last two elections have shown and this could shift quite rapidly.
Mr F saved the Tory Party in 2019. And what did they do with that?
P***ed it away because they thought they had won it by themselves…
Any move to the Left in Conservative policies will only increase Reform’s support. Just look how the Cameton-Johnson-Sunak cohort of rich kid O E’s and a Wy’ist gave in to the loony woke hustlers. They were soooo out of touch with young and old.
I was expecting Reform to garner something a little under 6 million rather than the 4 million they got. However, looking deeper, this is a straight consequence of the historically low turnout – the overall number of votes gained by every party is much lower than the percentage might suggest on a normal turnout.
It’s now 5 MPs (after several recounts in Basildon). At this aftenoon’s conference Nigel mentioned ‘professionalising’ the party. There will be a constitution and election of party leader (hot tip: he’ll win) and proper branches that elect their own officers. The focus will be outside of parliament on building a movement capable of competing in local elections and constructing a base form which to get more MPs with the focus on Labour. Sounds like a plan!
There’s a third winner here: Islam. Currently several ‘independent’ MPs who stood on a platform of supporting ‘Palestine’. One almost kicked out Jess Philips. Interesting to see if this becomes a more focused movement over the course of this parliament.
Don’t you mean a platform of murdering Jews?
I wouldn’t be surprised if we have an Islamic party standing candidates in 2029, that’s for sure. It’s now clear that they don’t need the Labour Party and Labour still got in despite many Muslims deserting them.
Don’t have much time for Phillips, but I’d choose her over that alternative any day of the week.
They won’t actually say that will they?
We are talking about the political process here. Toxic parties can unfortunately well become part of that process, especially with a large and increasing Muslim vote.
I’m much less optimistic, as I and most UnHerd readers would see it. “Full of older votes”. Well, quite….. Older voters are going to die off and younger voters are much more left wing and progressive. The Conservatives have entirely failed in any way to appeal to those voters, so who can blame them? I’m afraid we are now going to be in a long period of progressive rule.
Sometimes political shifts are structural and not practically reversible. (You might include the prospect of reducing, rather than increasing, the formal franchise in this, which isn’t to say that the average voter has more say over government policy then they did 50 years ago).
You can essentially miss the last boat sailing in a given direction. I keep reading about reversing the tide of immigration under the influence of Reform. But the beneficiaries of that tide also vote – and tend have a many more children. A more plausible analysis to me is that white working-class voters become just one of several voting blocs of ethically / culturally based constituencies in sometime bitter opposition to each other. This is not a particularly heartening prospect, but a very typical one of ethically divided societies worldwide.