X Close

Is Zelenskyy surrounding himself with yes-men?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy ponders his next reshuffle. Credit: Getty

February 6, 2024 - 10:00am

After months of speculation about a rift and rumours of a failed dismissal last week, it would appear that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has finally confirmed that the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, General Valerii Zaluzhnyi, is to be replaced — and he is not the only one. 

Asked by Italy’s Rai TV about Zaluzhnyi’s future, Zelenskyy discussed a wider reshuffle across the government and military, saying that a “reset, a new beginning is necessary […] not about a single person, but about the direction of the country’s leadership  […] I mean a replacement of a series of state leaders, not just in a single sector like the military.”

The loss of the highly popular Zaluzhnyi from the front line will undoubtedly lower morale among both Ukrainian troops and the wider public — polling conducted in December found that 92% of Ukrainians trust the general, compared to 77% for Zelenskyy, while only 2% would actively support such a dismissal. This blow comes at a particularly trying time for Ukraine’s army, as it struggles on through severe “shell hunger”, with the EU unable to meet its target of a million shells by March and political wrangling in Washington halting US aid. 

Zaluzhnyi has strong personal ties with his Western and Nato counterparts, with a wider reshuffle likely to disrupt key relationships just when they are most needed to ensure supplies are delivered to the front line. Zelenskyy reportedly walked back over an attempted sacking of Zaluzhnyi last week after pressure from dismayed Western partners, while Kyiv’s government volatility will likely be seized upon by sceptical US Republicans eager for excuses not to fund Ukraine. 

The shake-up may at least have the benefit of ending a rivalry that has destabilised Ukraine’s military structure. In December, sources claimed that Zaluzhnyi was struggling to command the army as a split emerged between those subordinate to him — perceived by Zelenskyy as “the bad ones” — and those loyal to Ground Forces Commander Oleksandr Syrskyi. As such, the President’s reshuffle may serve as a purge of Zaluzhnyi’s men that at least puts an end to creeping splits within the military command and promotes much-needed battlefield unity. However, the question remains as to who Zelenskyy appoints to replace “the bad ones”. 

Summoned to meet the President last week, Zaluzhnyi reportedly complained of Zelenskyy being surrounded by advisers whose assessments of Ukraine’s battlefield progress are excessively positive. Those close to the general lamented that presidential advisors have “poured him a warm bath, outside of which it is difficult to see the realities of the front”. 

One reason for the rift was this division between realism and positivity — in November, Zelenskyy publicly rebuked Zaluzhnyi for describing the war as a “stalemate” to the Economist, even though Ukraine’s President now uses the term himself. It may therefore be a cause for concern that Zelenskyy is seemingly using this opportunity to surround himself with even more “positivity”, in stark contrast to the outspoken and realistic counterweight Zaluzhnyi provided. In his own words, Zelenskyy is now seeking to ensure all in Ukraine’s command “push in the same direction, convinced of victory” and have “the right positive energy”. 

Zelenskyy’s interventions in the military have had negative impacts before. In December, sources close to Zaluzhnyi rallied against Zelenskyy’s interference in the military, not least his habit of bypassing the army chief to communicate directly with commanders. After the President last year dramatically sacked regional recruitment officers in a bid to publicly crack down on corruption, Zaluzhnyi complained openly of the frontline difficulties sparked by the loss of such experienced “professionals”.  

The shake-up may also signal that Zelenskyy needs unity for an imminent challenge. Russia will likely expand conscription after March’s presidential election, and reportedly aims to recruit 400,000 men this year. Ukraine’s parliament is now debating mobilisation, with the country’s political and military wings having last year both tried to distance themselves from talk of conscripting between 450,000 and 500,000 men. Zelenskyy’s changing of the high command may be an attempt to surround himself with “yes-men”, but it may also be a necessary precursor to an unpopular conscription campaign. 

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Cazaly
Michael Cazaly
2 months ago

Zaluzhnyi is to become Ambassador to the UK and Zelensky will appoint who he is told to…

Caradog Wiliams
Caradog Wiliams
2 months ago

Yes.

John Tyler
John Tyler
2 months ago

“ Zaluzhnyi has strong personal ties with his Western and Nato counterparts” may be true, but such ties are a waste of time as the West backs away from the war. The West would rather renege on its security guarantees (post Ukrainian denuclearisation) than face the inevitable bloodbath that will occur despite all our best efforts to appease the global bullies.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
2 months ago
Reply to  John Tyler

What ‘inevitable bloodbath’ are you talking about? Russia is not going to invade Europe any more than China is going to invade Taiwan. Are a half-million dead Ukrainians not enough?

Graham Stull
GS
Graham Stull
2 months ago

Fixed it for you:
“while Kyiv’s government volatility will likely be seized upon by sceptical US Republicans eager for excuses not to fund Ukraine. will serve as a clear demonstration of why further funding for Ukraine may not be the best use of scarce US taxpayer money. “

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
2 months ago

If there is to be a leadership reset, then it should start at the top. Who thought a comedian was the answer? This grift has gone on long enough.

Mark epperson
Mark epperson
2 months ago

Yes.

Jürg Gassmann
Jürg Gassmann
2 months ago

The piece fails on the basis of the assumption that Zelenskyy is an actual leader in his own right, and not – as he is – the hang-out and mouthpiece of a coterie of puppet masters.
The interesting piece of information – not reflected in this article – is that Ukraine’s appointed handler Victoria Nuland rushed to Kiev to sort it all out, and apparently failed.