X Close

Bernie Sanders has lost Vermont Working-class voters are fleeing the state

The Sanders compact has crumbled. Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Sanders compact has crumbled. Win McNamee/Getty Images


June 12, 2024   5 mins

A large, bearded man in a bandana strides out of a cabin surrounded by rusted trucks and spare car parts. He waves and points to a large sign on his roof, which reads: “Muslim Free Zone”. Looming over the nearby train-tracks, it is well placed to shock commuters and tourists hurtling by on their way to more appealing destinations.

Welcome to Rutland, a small city in one of Vermont’s beautiful mountain valleys. Here in so-called “Old Vermont”, the people are poorer and more conservative than in the liberal and wealthy city of Burlington. Rutland is a world apart from the pampered lands of “New Vermont”, with its affluent college towns, weed dispensaries, ski resorts and lakeside houses. Rural people here have been left behind, and their politics are growing more radical by the year.

For a long time, Vermont’s golden boy, US Senator Bernie Sanders, kept the peace between the state’s rural working class and liberal transplants from the coast. Despite a raging “Take Back Vermont” movement in the early 2000s, Sanders’s Left-wing populist policies settled tensions between the “woodchucks” and “flatlanders”. Sanders was and still is a contradictory figure, which suited his constituency perfectly. He is hesitantly pro-gun rights, but against the billboards that market them; fiercely libertarian while also supporting “big state” welfare policy; vocally pro-LGBT and veterans’ rights.

“For a long time, Bernie Sanders kept the peace between Vermont’s rural working class and liberal transplants from the coast.”

Yet the Sanders compact between Old and New Vermont is growing increasingly fragile. The gap between the poorest Vermonters and wealthy new arrivals is widening, as inflation, deindustrialisation, farming constraints and high property prices squeeze rural populations. Though the Green Mountain State is often considered a bastion of liberalism, it is no longer immune from the political fury poisoning the rest of America.

To get a sense of Vermont’s delicate political situation, I travelled to Burlington: the birthplace of New Vermont. In the late Sixties, refugees from the hippy movement, including Sanders, pitched up here and refashioned themselves as socialists. These hippy exiles — along with the expansion of college education — are credited with transforming Vermont from a Protestant Republican stronghold into a liberal Democratic one.

“This used to be a very Republican state up until the Sixties” says Janet Metz, Chair of Chittenden County Republicans. “You had a lot of people coming to study at the University of Vermont and staying here. A lot of the hippy generation came up here too — not going to school, but living on communes.”

Eventually these starry-eyed bohemians would grow up, start businesses and buy houses. Politics became pragmatic as the Progressive Party replaced New Left radical movements such as the Liberty Union. Sanders’s former comrades in the Liberty Union would go on to disavow him in 1999 as a “bomber”, “imperialist” and “sell-out” over his supposed support of Nato’s intervention in Yugoslavia. At one point, they even occupied his Burlington congressional office. But it wasn’t enough to stop the rise of Vermont’s new Progressive nobility.

From Burlington I head to the small farming town of Hinesburg. When I arrive, Vermont’s Progressive Lieutenant Governor, David Zuckerman, picks me up in a rundown car he uses for farming organic chickens, pigs and CBD. Zuckerman has known Sanders since the Nineties, and the two are cut from the same cloth: like Sanders, Zuckerman is a Vermont expat hailing from the Boston suburbs; a progressive, but also a pragmatic, straight-talking social democrat. You can see glimmers of Vermont’s old New Left libertarian ethos in his opposition to mandatory government vaccination among other things. And there is talk that he might one day succeed Sanders as a Vermont senator.

For now, Zuckerman believes Vermont’s communities haven’t yet been ruined by polarisation. “People are respectful to their neighbours,” he tells me. “It’s still a value, because you might go off the road in the middle of the night in a snowstorm. Everyone’s going to help — it doesn’t matter what bumper stickers are on your car. Compared to the rest of the country, it’s a strong ethic.” Yet, Zuckerman admits that this compact between Vermonters is less strong than it was decades ago.

Perhaps the state of local politics in New England explains this relative harmony. Where national politics divides the state, respect for local democracy unites it. I’ve arrived on Town Meeting Day, an annual event where townsfolk come together to debate and vote on local issues. It’s a New England tradition dating to the colonial era: for 24 hours, ordinary voters turn into legislators and scrutinise the town budget. These small, rural community meetings have “empowered us to demand authenticity in our relationship with leaders”, says Susan Clark, a writer on Vermont politics and co-author of Slow Democracy: Rediscovering Community, Bringing Decision Making Back Home.

The stubbornness and eccentricity of Vermonters is on full display at the meeting. Citizens vote on everything from fire trucks to pavements. One woman stands up several times and asks: “Why do we need four snow ploughs and seven cops? We can do with two ploughs and five cops.” The officials chairing the debate provide justifications for the numbers, and the woman blankly refuses to concede her point. Between votes, the chair of the meeting mills around and chats with residents about Donald Trump and the dangers of the next presidential election.

The gap between politicians and the citizenry feels smaller here than elsewhere, with retirees and young police officers stopping to chat with, or lambast, Zuckerman about small-town and global issues alike. Here, political conversation is often infused with wider American anxieties about class, power and economics. The culture war is never far away.

By contrast, Town Meeting Day in Burlington is a lethargic affair. There is the odd road sign and a dozen picketers huddled against the rain. The people I stop in the street are apathetic, shrugging me off while muttering “they’re all the same, aren’t they?” The political energy of Hinesburg appears to have dissipated in the city. All the Progressive Party activists I talk to seem quietly dispirited: it was only four years ago that their candidate was poised to take the White House.

The Republican chair, Metz, is similarly disillusioned. “If you look at who’s in the Vermont house and legislature as Democrats and Progressives, it’s trust-fund babies, people with spouses who make a lot of money.” Moreover, Metz points out that, increasingly, it is not the Progressives who are threatening her base, but widespread apathy and distrust of party politics. “I’m competitive in the northwest part of my county, in Milton, but it’s changing,” she says. “If you look, district by district, people identified as independents often now outnumber Democrats and Republicans combined.”

Metz explains that a lot of the “Old Vermont” crowd, those who traditionally made up her Republican base, are leaving. “What’s really driving populism in Vermont are the people who have lived here for generations and can’t pay their property taxes anymore… A lot of our people are leaving the state — they’re just up and leaving. They’re moving to New Hampshire, Florida and the Carolinas because they can’t afford to live here anymore.”

Their exodus is symbolic of the wider breakdown of the Bernie Sanders compact. His vision of an affordable, independent and proudly democratic Vermont, in which Old and New coexisted peacefully, now appears a fruitless daydream. In its place is anger and resentment. The home of radical Left-wing populism has finally succumbed to the now-familiar American rot of polarisation.


Samuel McIlhagga is a British writer and journalist. He works on political thought and theory, culture and foreign affairs.

McilhaggaSamuel

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

37 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T Bone
T Bone
3 months ago

I don’t consider it a rot. The US isn’t all that different politically now than it was at its inception and most of its existence. You had a Federalist faction that wanted a really strong Federal Government and a Democratic-Republican faction that favored State’s Rights.

The Federalists correctly pointed out that States needed to grant specific guaranteed rights to everyone. The Democratic-Republicans correctly point out the problems with an expansive Central Planner.

Bernie Sanders is not a traditional American populist. American populist traditionally favor limited government at both the State and Federal Levels. That’s why they favor State’s rights. They wanted to live in a non-interventionalist State. Bernie favors extremely large government things like Single Payer which is a massive Federalist project. There’s nothing local about his Single Payer program. These people in the story are voting with their feet. It’s as American as it gets. Did it myself!

Vermont didn’t even follow through with it in their own State. Why not? Why not test single payer in a small state with a bunch of people committed to the cause? If you can’t pull of Socialism in your tiny State, what makes you think you can do it Nationally?

Mark M Breza
Mark M Breza
3 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

Forget the yuppies 
Reagan broke both the welfare system and the unions for good. Creating a visceral dislike for hard labor and the disadvantaged.
Laying the groundwork for Clinton’s shipping jobs overseas in return for cheap products from cheap labor 

T Bone
T Bone
3 months ago
Reply to  Mark M Breza

Alot of generalizations there.
How did Reagan break Unions?
How did he break the welfare system?

It seems the welfare system is flourishing at all time levels.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

You may want to start with wikipedia on Reagan then research lasting damage done by Appellant Judge Bork.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_policy_of_the_Ronald_Reagan_administration

Michael Layman
Michael Layman
3 months ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

OK, I read the Wikipedia synopsis and still cannot find evidence to support your point. Please clarify.

Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
3 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

Well said. The levels of polarization we see today are the rule, not the exception. Today’s political climate would be more easily recognized by the first generation of Americans after the revolution, or those of 1824, or 1924. The period from WWII up to about 2010 or 2016 or wherever you want to draw that line is actually the outlier. Global conflict created an illusion of harmony and unity. In the face of a common enemy, Americans yielded much of their usual contrarian tendencies and allowed a powerful national government to establish the things needed to have a hegemonic empire, namely a set of strong nonpartisan institutions at the national level to establish consistent policy across party lines. Once the USSR fell in 1991, the clock started ticking for America to revert back to what it usually has been throughout its history.
Sanders is a bit of an enigma. He calls himself a socialist, but isn’t. If he were truly a doctrinaire socialist, he couldn’t get elected dog catcher. He’s inherently a product of local politics. Most American politicians are. I attribute the lions share of his successes to blind chance. He’s a contrarian personality from a traditionally contrarian state during a period of high anti-elite sentiment when that contrarian nature happened to be particularly appealing, various isms notwithstanding.
Part of the reason the ‘Federalists’ have always wanted/needed a more powerful federal government and a unified national policy is because they know that if they don’t have that, there will be fifty different solutions, some of which will be more successful than others, and some which will be downright disasters. This will then trigger Americans to ‘vote with their feet’. This is already happening as California is in a death spiral of importing unskilled unassimilated immigrants, criminals, and homeless while the productive population leaves for Texas, Florida, Tennessee, North Carolina, etc. The policies that are pragmatic, popular, and efficient will attract residents while unpopular, inefficient policies will drive residents away. The Federalists aren’t stupid. They don’t really believe their own collectivist solutions will work. They know that people will opt out if they can. In other words, they can’t allow any competition because they know they’d lose.

T Bone
T Bone
3 months ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

Some really good thoughts there.  I’m reading about the Jefferson/Adams correspondence right now.  Its so similar to the arguments we’re having now except some but not all of the party-line issues are flipped.

Adams was the Conservative and Jefferson was the liberal. The Conservative Federalists were more anti-immigration, anti-war and domestic-focused but wanted big finance and an ultra strong central government.  The Liberal Democratic Republicans were more pro-immigration, pro-war but wanted an agrarian economy with basically all the power vested in the States.

But State’s Rights weren’t upholding the Declaration of Independence principle that all Men are Created Equal.  So, after a long fight, we strengthened the Constitution to abolish slavery.  We don’t have any issue like that today that requires hostile takeover.  Climate Change Activism is not Anti-Slavery activism.  Abolishing Fossil fuels is nothing like abolishing slavery. There’s no justification for Federalists today to forcefully impose their green moral agenda onto States that reject it’s economic utility.

Kat L
Kat L
3 months ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

I can’t disagree with this however voting with feet is the absolute worst solution as the parasite will always vote and then leave before facing the consequence; then promptly ruin their new home with the same policies.

0 0
0 0
3 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

I didn’t imagine that someone who knew as little as this about Sanders would chance an arm like that. Sorry, it’s fallen off.

0 0
0 0
3 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

The Federalists borrowed to lend very cheaply to infant industries which launched the industrial revolution there. Everyone else had to do with the ordinary banking system. It worked a treat. Russie is doing this now and China something not very different. Europe and now the US itself is at the pleasure of rentiers. They can have their penny but they’ve no right to oresidevovervthe future if national economies.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
3 months ago

Very well written, engaging essay. I’m not sure the author is breaking any new ground with his content, but I really enjoyed this essay. I love it when writers get out there and talk to actual people.

T Bone
T Bone
3 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

I read through a few of his other articles. Agree that he’s a super engaging writer.

Christopher Barclay
Christopher Barclay
3 months ago

It doesn’t sound like Vermont is succumbing to the ‘rot of polarisation’ but to high housing costs and high taxation.

William Simonds
William Simonds
3 months ago

Bernie Sanders is a symptom, not a cause. I live in Maine, another state with a “town meeting” form of local government. The difference between the local activism of the smaller towns that have that “smaller gap” between “politicians and citizenry” is because those smaller towns actually have an in person, everybody shows up, you get to voice your opinion, actual face to faces meeting. In the larger towns, the progressive elements have deemed such in person meetings as too unwieldy and impossible to control and have replaced them with secret ballots. There is no actual meeting. It’s just another voting day. There is no forum for asking questions or expressing opinions or voicing concerns. And so, entirely predictably, the populace becomes lethargic and distanced from the actual decision making process. In that environment, there is less engagement and greater polarization. People aren’t leaving the state from those smaller towns. They are from the larger ones, and that is just fine with the progressive elite…because to them, the “right” kind of people that are leaving.

0 0
0 0
3 months ago

Nothing in the interesting things you say above which supports your final remarks

Pip G
Pip G
3 months ago

“Progressive Party”? A quick search suggests it is a separate political party active in Vermont. Not the same as the “Progressive Party formed by Theodore Roosevelt.
I never understand what “progressive” means. Progress towards what? Whenever I read ‘progressive’ in the Labour Party, I know it refers to the self morally superior or is meaningless.

M James
M James
2 months ago
Reply to  Pip G

In rock music, progressive refers to a lack of a “punk sensibility”. To which I say, hip hip hurray.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 months ago

As a resident of a rural area in Vermont, I would like to point out that much of the problem here has to do with policies driven by people who have moved here from elsewhere (of which I am admittedly one, though I don’t share their general perspective). Vermont looks like a giant opportunity for status and wealth for these new colonizers who are increasingly development-minded. Their contempt for traditional, inter- and independent Vermonters is no secret. My neighbors are broad brushed as foam at the mouth haters by those living in the Burlington area, (even the author does this in the first paragraph), but nothing could be further from the truth. We raise food together, put up hay, and generally help each other thrive amidst skyrocketing increases in taxes, electric rates and pressures to give up this way of life. I wish the author would have visited the real Vermont outside of the urban reaches of Chittenden County where Burlington is located (Hinesburg is a bedroom community to Burlington, by the way). Urban Vermont dismisses rural traditional Vermont as ‘right wing, trump-voting savages’. This is the familiar pattern of colonizers throughout history.

0 0
0 0
3 months ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Could you drill down into what kind of conflicts you see around ‘development’ there? And where? Around the fringes of Burlington or anywhere else?

And, apart from differing local interests about ‘development’, in what other respect have incomers wished to rule at odds with others? Or did impose themselves?;

The Vermont I know better, Rutland and Windsor counties , hasn’t seen such conflicts. Incomers and their investments have been welcome.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 months ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

WTF-I’m amazed someone is paid for this crap story, not good fiction or satire!

Clearly no fact checking! First paragraph, Rutland is adjacent to the two largest ski resorts: Pico and Killington, Burlington has tiny Bolton Valley. Both cities have weed dispensaries. The only accurate line, Burlington has more colleges nearby than Rutland.

Writer states “Rural people (sic) here have been left behind, and their politics are growing more radical by the year.” What? “radical implies extreme. Voters in rural areas were always conservative and some may be more so each year. They are not becoming extreme conservatives either.

Everyone knows (except this ‘writer’) “ Despite a raging “Take Back Vermont” movement in the early 2000s” that movement, had NOTHING TO DO WITH SANDERS! Signs started appearing in July 2000 with “Remember in November” and “Take back Vermont” the writer links a photo of a barn in Chelsea, NY. An accurate explanation can be found here. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/backlash-in-vermont/

What billboards? “but against the billboards that market them;” Do you even visit Vermont?
There have never been billboards in Vermont.

What? “Zuckerman is a Vermont expat” makes no sense! Zuckerman is from Boston, MA and perhaps in Britain, they teach that Boston is a different country than the US.

And Metz’s republican crowd, well they have aged since the sixties and died or left the state to retire in the south. The battle has been between democrats and progressives for 50 years. Republicans have become as scarce as henwheys!

M James
M James
2 months ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

I love the henwhey reference at the end. Thank you for the surprise chuckle.

JR Stoker
JR Stoker
3 months ago

Bernie says he is a socialist (boo) and tends to behave like one (hiss), but there is a streak of non-conformity and libertarianism in him (hurray). I probably would not vote for the guy, but I do secretly rather have a soft spot for the cantankerous old sod.

0 0
0 0
3 months ago
Reply to  JR Stoker

You could well have had me instead of Bernie with a different blend of socialism and liberaralism as explained above But not ‘libertarianism” which is an anti politics even in America. Let’s be clear. When I went from Washington to see my Aunt Dot in 1965 to tell her I’d learned from Johnson’s chief speechwriter that they didn’t know what was going on in Vietnam but thought they coud suppress it, she said ‘ if they don’t know what they’re doing you can’t respect them and if they try to intimidate people you all must resist, that ‘s not libertarian. It’s the strong resolve of people with life experience who are not easily impressed.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
3 months ago

fiercely libertarian while also supporting “big state” welfare policy
Uh, no; those two things are mutually exclusive, but that seems to be Bernie, trying to hold fundamentally contradictory positions. The other point, the exodus, reads like a smaller version of what is happening in far larger locales – the normals are voting with their feet when outnumbered at the ballot box. Is there anything that progressives do not ruin? That does not make conservatives superior, but it’s hard to miss the obvious.

0 0
0 0
3 months ago
Reply to  Alex Lekas

No. Bernie, although an incomer, was astute enough to understand that in the Vermont he knew then, those things were complementary not mutually exclusive. So don’t insist on importing your problems there.

If course, people can migrate for political reasons. Leaving the UK for the Continent because of Brexit for example. Or Ukraine or elsewhere because your government is depriving you of rights and even attacking you. That’s a different order of thing.
.
You’d be surprised at how ‘progressive’ normal Vermonters are.

RA Znayder
RA Znayder
3 months ago
Reply to  Alex Lekas

A big part of your first sentence is because in the US words like libertarian, liberal and conservative have lost their original meaning. So to find if things are mutually exclusive, first we need to establish what we’re even talking about.

Allison Barrows
Allison Barrows
3 months ago

“Golden boy” Sanders is an old Marxist in his 80s who spent his honeymoon in the Soviet Union and took a bribe to drop out of the race for president.

People are leaving Vermont for New Hampshire? Nonsense. Formerly conservative New Hampshire is a wealthy state where it is also expensive to live. We left NH in 2021 for Florida because of the state’s absurd responses to Covid. Many of my friends up there say people are still wearing the ridiculous masks.

Also, where is the author seeing billboards? They aren’t allowed along the highways, and I’ve never seen one in Brattleboro, or Putney, or Bennington. As for Burlington, the city has been a drug-and crime-filled toilet for decades. Maybe people are moving, as we did, to sane, well-run, beautiful states.

Stowe Boyd
Stowe Boyd
3 months ago

Note that Vermont has a net in-migration of over 17,000 in 2021-2022, more than the prior ten years combined. And housing is quite expensive. People might be moving out to cash in on their home equity. But ‘Departing residents cited housing difficulties as their No. 1 reason for leaving the state in 2021 and 2022, according to a new report from the state treasurer’s office.’

Hale Virginia
Hale Virginia
3 months ago

For a deeper look into Burlington politics specifically, the weekly podcast Disaffected, made by Vermonter Joshua Slocum gives a great analysis about where the breakdown really is. That town is being overrun by progressive nut jobs, rich ones at that. To understand the “polarization” you speak of, look no further than this episode https://disaffectedpod.substack.com/p/disaffected-episode-147

0 0
0 0
3 months ago
Reply to  Hale Virginia

Vermonters don’t normally complain about investment in their communities generating jobs, private or public. The whole idea of complaining about progressive nut jobs is an imported kind of politics there which Vermonters would be happier without.

0 0
0 0
3 months ago

I was brought up in Springfield Vermont seventy years ago. Many relatives worked at Vermont Marble in Rutland where my uncle was once Sales Director. Most in Springfield worked in its historic machine tool industry which supplied turret latches, gear milling machines and turret latches for lass production. But most in my family, the county or in Vermont as a whole, were farmers or foresters. A few had side jobs in summer or ski tourism in winter. Burlington on Lake Champlain with its state university campus was always a world apart from the crest of Vermont but had a positive symbiotic relationship with it’

Circumstances differed sharply between sectors over time. The toolmakers work was sharply cyclical, the marble industry had cheap foreign competition. And farming had been on secular decline from the time railways opened up Wisconsin, abandoned farma and villages abounded until Ben and Jerry’s stemmed the tide. Emigration from Vermont has a looong history, my family alone moved out to Delaware, Ohio, and ultimately Arizona. No other ways

This was Vermont before the influx from New York City, Boston and elsewhere changed the scene, buying up redundant farmhouses before they collapsed, a plus in my book This happened all over the state but as with Brits in France there were favourite areas. In some of these areas house prices have risen beyond the means of local people just as they have in southern Brittany, the Dordogne or around Collioure. That has everything to do with migration and nothing to do with Bernie’s ‘progressive politics’ or anything like that..

Bernie was an incomer there, I accept. I knew the political scene when he came because that’s when I left, even though some said I should become the next junior Senator from Vermont. I would have a campaigned on a somewhat different line from Bernie. Tighter on gun laws having known people wounded in hunting accidents. An defender of town meeting direct democracy and especially of the part time state legislature which made it possible for my toolmaker uncle to serve several terms while holding down his job.

But in national politic, I would have gone further faster where Bernie went. On affordable public health insurance for example. And desisting from adventures abroad. Both of which reflect historic core Vermont values. As were drilled into me by my grandmother. A farmer’s daughter and toolmaker’s wife, onetime Republican converted to Johnson’s civil rights and his Great Society programme because of her devout Methodism.

So you can forget facile juxtapositions. The seat of progressive values is in the same place as individualist or traditionalist ones. It’s the contexts which shape our chives which count.

Dillon Eliassen
Dillon Eliassen
3 months ago

I lived in Vermont for my high school and college days. This article seems written by a person who A. did not study Bernie’s biography, B. spent a few hours “researching” a very limited region of Vermont, C. doesn’t know the definition of “libertarian.”
Bernie is not an ex-hippy from Boston, he’s a democratic socialist & civil rights advocate from Brooklyn. The lack of billboards advertising guns in Vermont has nothing to do with Bernie and guns; billboards are universally banned in the state, period. Bernie also used to be very pro-firearm until about 10 years ago because Vermont has a very pro-gun culture due to hunting and the lack of police in most areas, so residents need them to protect their property. There is nothing “libertarian” about Bernie or VT state government. The author might have intended to describe “libertine,” which is a common conflation with libertarian, but they are two distinctly different concepts. Vermont has zero economy save for spotty tourism and syrup; that lack of economy has contributed mightily to the state’s heavy drug abuse and domestic violence problem. These plagues show up nowhere in the author’s article.

Jerry Carroll
Jerry Carroll
3 months ago

Bernie is a phony who became a millionaire in public office like so many politicians.

Kat L
Kat L
3 months ago

Of course it was always going to end up like this…

Ryan K
Ryan K
3 months ago

I ‘ve been trying to understand Vermont’s love affair with B. Sanders. It’s a nice state….lots of farmers, lots of working class out of Russell Banks’ novel. How could that many ex hippies, socialists, et al move to Vermont to so change the state. Is Burlington that wealthy? Bennington was somnambulist. Brattleboro has the restaurants, the shops, the tourists. But the rest of the state? Some young guy who’d done a month or two on an Israeli socialist, atheist kibbutz in the early sixties decides to make aliyah to all white and few Jews Vermont. He’s some piece of work along with Ben and Jerry and the rest of that ilk. I wish Vermonters would not leave but take their state back….I don’t mean from Jews….I mean from the socialists. Muslim free zone? what’s that all about? Have their been pro hamas marches in Burlington. 3 young guys got shot…was that Vermont…. because they were Arabs so alleged, that got a lot of play. Fit into the narrative that Palestinians have to live in fear. No, it’s the Jews who are living in fear. In NYC. In Vermont we may not be so fearful.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 months ago

Reading the headline, I thought the article would say that voters in Vermont were generally tending rightward, but the article says the opposite. Rightwingers are leaving.

Gerry Quinn
Gerry Quinn
2 months ago

“If you look, district by district, people identified as independents often now outnumber Democrats and Republicans combined.”

She sounds like she thinks that’s a bad thing.