When Joe Biden announced his intention to join a United Auto Workers’ picket line in Michigan, his breathless supporters lionised the “historic” and “unprecedented” decision. Amid the praise, there was little mention of the fact that Biden is only visiting the Wolverine State today because Donald Trump had already pledged to visit workers there tomorrow. Nor was there much interest in the political machinations threatening to topple the industry’s bargaining tables.
In the week and a half since the strike against the Detroit Three automakers — General Motors, Ford and Stellantis — was called, the UAW has rolled out a number of unprecedented tactics, from hitting all three manufacturers at once to openly sharing term proposals from negotiations with members and the public. As clever as these manoeuvres may seem, however, and whatever increase in compensation the union ends up winning, the result will be a pyrrhic victory at best. Already, human labour is becoming less and less relevant to the production needs of all automakers, and the “Big Three” in particular are losing their market share. The record wage-and-benefits boosts UAW President Shawn Fain is seeking will only accelerate these trends.
In one way, at least, Fain has the automakers over a barrel: UAW workers’ counterparts in thousands of US factories have been getting significant wage increases lately, with even some blue-collar service jobs approaching the kind of sumptuous hourly compensation that manufacturing jobs singularly used to provide. And yet, one might also wonder why Fain is trying to drive such a hard bargain with negotiators who had already agreed to deliver record-breaking compensation increases to their unionised workers. The typical auto worker, after all, already enjoys some major financial cushions that add up, on a percentage basis at least, to the kind of perks enjoyed by industry executives. These include annual profit-sharing payouts that typically have amounted to $8,000-$12,000 or more per worker since the Great Recession, as well as “ratification bonuses” of several thousand dollars for simply agreeing to vote in favour of the union’s new contract with an automaker.
In light of this, what does the union really hope to achieve? The answer, many suspect, lies in its attempts to indemnify remaining members against the inevitable further dwindling of UAW jobs, just as the UAW have been doing for decades. The unions know fully well that the dawning era of electronic-vehicle production requires about 70% of the labour required to make traditional internal-combustion vehicles, mostly because of the absence of heavy and complicated engine and transmission systems. Faced with the paring of thousands of jobs, the hope is that remaining workers are going to continue to be compensated at the top of the US industrial scale.
Yet while that is the aim, various political machinations make the reality far murkier. Internally, for instance, Fain barely won his election last spring after running as an outsider candidate against a UAW establishment that festered in corruption, landing its past two presidents in prison. As a result, Fain’s aggressive rhetoric towards the automakers in part reflects his need to conjure up a sufficiently plump settlement that will demonstrate his leadership bona fides as a wet-behind-the-ears outsider.
As for Biden, the rationale behind his trip extends far beyond denying Trump an exclusive photo-op. The nearly $800-billion auto industry accounts for about 3% of overall US economic output, which is still concentrated in the Upper Midwest and battleground states such as Michigan and Ohio. A UAW strike that cripples the Detroit Three and leads to massive layoffs and even temporary economic contraction wouldn’t be the kind of “Bidenomics” that would benefit the president’s re-election bid.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI somehow doubt that Biden has the faintest idea why he is going to Michigan – or even where it is. How long are the Democrats going to allow this farce to continue?
Memories of Konstantin Chernenko?
Lack of memories, perhaps?
Some chaps here seem to be suffering from a bout of ‘sense of humour failure’!
Right now he doesn’t even know who Biden is.
Given Biden’s recent polling issues – WaPo/ABC poll over the weekend had Trump up 9 points (NINE POINTS) against Biden – Biden’s team are coming to realize that, oops! An election win against Trump isn’t a foregone conclusion.
People don’t like Biden. People don’t like Bidenomics. People don’t like Trump. People did like the Trump economy prior to covid.
The Democrats have got the heebie jeebies. Biden is clearly incompetent and the ‘Uncle Joe’ schtick doesn’t work anymore. He is a nasty, corrupt old man who shouldn’t be where he is. And who is waiting in the wings should the Democrats be unable to continue propping him up? Kamala Harris, who possibly the most disliked and useless VP in history.
Hence, Newsom will be at the GOP debate on Wednesday to refute Republican talking points afterwards. He will also debate DeSantis on Fox in November.
Interesting times.
“The Administration is forcing the automakers that employ UAW workers to plunge into vehicle electrification and battery systems far more quickly than they would like to — and using its new industrial policy to push heavily incentivised EV nameplates into the marketplace at a much faster pace than American consumers are demanding them. In other words, the Biden that will visit Michigan today to demonstrate “solidarity” with the UAW strikers is the very same Biden who is using US taxpayer funds to undercut their future in a very severe way.”
This assessment highly underappreciates how much citizens feel liberated by State command economies. It’s not that American consumers don’t want EVs, its that they don’t know they want them yet. Maybe a little more nudging is needed to let citizens know a good person would enthusiastically buy an unnecessary product if doing so supports a State ambition.
He is an ally only of the People’s Republic of China. His inflationary and corporatist legislation actually subsidising imports of Chinese green technology. The EU should wage a wide-spanning trade war against the US while the Democrats remain in office.
Luddites making a last stand against progress and automation