X Close

What women coppers conceal Britain's police forces still drip with misogyny

What would Helen do? (Prime Suspect)


August 25, 2022   6 mins

If a woman wanted to become a police officer in the Seventies, she joined the Women’s Police Department. Run separately from the mainstream service, its main purpose was to deal with “women’s issues” such as sexual assault and domestic violence. Female officers were considered suitable for consoling a woman who’d just had her handbag stolen, or making tea for rape complainants, but expected to stay well clear if a door needed bashing in or there were serious criminals to arrest. At one stage Jackie Malton, who joined up in Leicestershire in 1970, was put in charge of a spate of pram thefts.

During this period, before feminism had had much of an influence, female police officers endured a barrage of sexist comments in the canteen, and out on patrol. Malton’s nickname among her male colleagues was “The Tart”. Nevertheless, she rose through the ranks to become a Detective Chief Inspector in the Metropolitan Police, becoming the inspiration behind Helen Mirren’s character, DCI Jane Tennison, in the hit Nineties crime series Prime Suspect. Now, Malton has written a book, The Real Prime Suspect, which tells the story of Britain’s police culture from 1970 to the current day.

There couldn’t be a better moment for its publication. Awareness of misogyny within the police service has never been higher, public confidence in police attitudes towards violence against women never lower. I found feminism in 1979, during one of the most shameful periods of police sexism, the hunt for the Yorkshire Ripper, an investigation doomed from the start because police decided that many of the 13 women brutally murdered by the serial killer were asking for it. But in the era spanned by Malton’s career, things haven’t changed enough.

Advertisements

The abduction, rape and murder last spring of Sarah Everard by serving police officer Wayne Couzens exposed the persistence of misogyny within the service. Indeed, the College of Policing was this month compelled to issue a statement reassuring the public that “officers who abuse their trust to groom vulnerable victims, or engage in sexual impropriety, including harassment, are more likely to be dismissed and barred from policing” (italics mine). The college admits that there are many officers still in post who have been found to have committed such offences.

The Real Prime Suspect documents recent events, and Malton acknowledges that all is not yet fair and equal when it comes to women in the police service. She certainly reveals the roots of the current toxic culture by telling her extraordinary story of success in the days when female police officers had barely any legal or employment rights, and were often seen by male colleagues as inferior irritants. But her book reads as though the bad old days are long gone.

It’s true that the police service Malton left in the late Nineties was a very different service to the one she’d joined. Women were by then serving in most areas of policing, and it was no longer deemed acceptable to openly refer to female officers as “bikes” or “dykes”. A lesbian, Malton chose not to be out at work in those early days — it was already hard enough being a woman in a testosterone-fuelled environment where resentment towards female officers was rife. But her colleagues soon suspected that Malton might not be interested in men, except as hard-drinking companions, and she would regularly be presented with vibrators, because, as she was often told, all women need is a good fuck.

Despite her treatment, Malton persevered. She had always wanted to become a detective, and, following the introduction of the Sex Discrimination Act in 1975 — which led to a change in working conditions for women as well as equal opportunities with their male counterparts — her dream began to look like it might come true. “You’re the first split-arse DI we’ve had here,” she was told by her superior officer at her first Central London posting. By 1989, she had made Detective Chief Constable.

That same year, I met Malton at a conference. She was representing the Hammersmith and Fulham Domestic Violence Unit; I was campaigning against violence towards women. In a session on police responses to domestic abuse, a senior male officer claimed that things had changed significantly since the days when the crime was seen as a “private matter” between a married couple. Malton leapt to her feet and told her superior: “bullshit!” She then went on to outline every way in which the police were still letting down victims, winning applause from many of us in the room.

We didn’t know it then, but Malton’s life was about to change forever. In 1990 she had a meeting with a “striking, petite woman with a fabulous smile and a cascade of red curly hair”. Writer Lynda La Plante was developing a script for a TV series about a female DCI leading a murder enquiry. At the time, Malton was one of only three female DCIs in the Metropolitan Police. Soon, she began working as script consultant on what was to become the stratospherically successful Prime Suspect.

Many of the best-known scenes in the show came directly from Malton. In the first episode, when Tennison is, against many of her colleagues’ better judgment, made head of a murder enquiry following the sudden death of her male counterpart, she is addressed by a young copper as “ma’am”. Mirren throws him a withering look and says: “Call me Boss or Guv, but don’t call me Ma’am. I’m not the bloody Queen.” I remember posters in lesbian clubs with those words coming out of Mirren’s mouth in a speech bubble. Tennison quickly became a major feminist icon. But, though Malton was by that point “out” at work, she advised La Plante that the public was not ready to empathise with a lesbian protagonist. Tennison was developed as a heterosexual woman who fails at relationships because she puts the job first.

Another line that ended up in Prime Suspect came from a story Malton told La Plante about the sexist banter to which women subjected, day in, day out. The character of DS Bill Otley, a vulgar misogynist, was based on an officer Malton had worked with, who had once pointed at a female colleague and asked his mates: “Who would fancy that skinny dyke?” But there’s one anecdote that shocked even me, told to me by Malton a few years ago, when we were working together on a Radio 4 documentary about sexism within the police service, Malton told a hilarious but grotesque story about how male officers, after a few Friday night drinks in the police bar, would see how many 10p pieces they could get under their foreskin. “One officer managed £3.20,” she told me.

When Prime Suspect was on air, a number of serving and retired female officers contacted Malton to tell her they recognised the misogyny exposed by the storylines. Thanks largely to Malton, the dire situation for women in the police became common knowledge. But in some ways that makes it even more shocking that male officers are still getting away with it.

A whopping 70% of civilian police employees working alongside police officers reported witnessing sexual harassment, according to research conducted in 2018 by the London School of Economics. Of the 311,776 Unison members polled (two-thirds of whom were women), more than three quarters reported sexist jokes; one third reported intrusive questions about their private life; and more than a fifth reported inappropriate leering or staring. There were also complaints about sexual gestures and hints that sexual favours could lead to preferential treatment.

Meanwhile, as reported by the Centre for Women’s Justice, almost 700 cases of alleged domestic abuse involving police officers and staff were reported during the three years leading to April 2018. This data covers three quarters of police forces. It shows that police employees accused of domestic abuse are a third less likely to be convicted than the general public. Fewer than a quarter of complaints of domestic abuse resulted in disciplinary action.

Horrifying case studies abound, and there are hundreds we never hear about. A recent Times expose showed that many disciplinaries of male police officers involving vulnerable females are held in private. It has recently been revealed, for instance, that a number of serving male officers shared deeply offensive WhatsApp messages — such as one who wrote that he “enjoyed the need”, while on duty, to physically restrain a very vulnerable and disturbed 15-year-old girl, because he got pleasure from a “struggle snuggle”.

Still, the impression one could be left with, having read Malton’s book, is that the vast majority of male police officers are exemplary, brave public servants. I don’t accept this version of events. Malton’s story is inspiring, but even though it’s now 25 years since she left the Met, she remains in many ways fiercely loyal to her tribe. You know the saying: once a copper, always a copper.

So, despite the candid scrutiny of old-style sexism in the cop shop, The Real Prime Suspect is a bit of a puff piece when it comes to the police service today. What we need is a book by a retired female officer who is willing to do a warts-and-all expose. Because it is only when the public becomes aware of the extent of woman-hating in the service that root and branch reform will become unavoidable. Let us hope there is a brave whistleblower out there, who can show the nation how much worse our police force is than DCI Tennison’s.


Julie Bindel is an investigative journalist, author, and feminist campaigner. Her latest book is Feminism for Women: The Real Route to Liberation. She also writes on Substack.

bindelj

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

47 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Martin Bollis
MB
Martin Bollis
1 year ago

This was an interesting and informative article until the last paragraph. The woman who actually worked in the force, who had the 25 years experience, who was the trailblazer, confirms that the majority of policemen are decent people.

The misandrist activist can’t believe that and demands a “warts and all” expose, otherwise known as a hit piece.

Like all activists, she massively inflates the actions of a minority. Thus Britain becomes institutionally racist, homophobic, blah blah, rather than a tolerant country where a few intolerant people live.

Tom Watson
Tom Watson
1 year ago
Reply to  Martin Bollis

The thing you have to bear in mind though is that she doesn’t accept that version of events, so there.

Also I thought “a recent Times expose showed that many disciplinaries of male police officers involving vulnerable females are held in private” was particularly laughable. Unless there’s something specific to the police I’m not aware of, aren’t disciplinary hearings supposed to be held in private? They’re not criminal trials, they’re purely internal procedures to establish whether misconduct has taken place.

michael stanwick
MS
michael stanwick
1 year ago
Reply to  Martin Bollis

Yes, I agree. But there is another egregious claim …
Still, the impression one could be left with, having read Malton’s book, is that the vast majority of male police officers are exemplary, brave public servants. I don’t accept this version of events. Malton’s story is inspiring, but even though it’s now 25 years since she left the Met, she remains in many ways fiercely loyal to her tribe. You know the saying: once a copper, always a copper.
… the directed ad hominem of the ‘appeal to motive’ towards Malton as in once a copper, always a copper, in order to discredit Malton’s loyalty to the Met.

Bernard Hill
BH
Bernard Hill
1 year ago

…where’s the “women hating” in all the stuff you’ve mentioned Julie? The fact pretty much all men are prone to rudeness about females and sexuality generally, doesn’t mean that behavior must be interpreted as “hate” for women. Some men may well “hate” having to be interdependent with them for sex and much else, but it seems to me you have much the same attitude towards having to deal with men. Strange how nobody talks about women wanting their separateness, or disliking boorish male behavior as being misandry.

Steve Murray
Steve Murray
1 year ago
Reply to  Bernard Hill

I found it a convincing article until that line about “women hating”. Why do so many Unherd writers ruin otherwise well-argued pieces with throwaways?

Dominic S
Dominic S
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve Murray

It was no throwaway……

Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
1 year ago

I am wondering if the macho sexist culture of yore resulted in more criminal convictions than contemporary woke police culture.

Last edited 1 year ago by Aphrodite Rises
tom j
TJ
tom j
1 year ago

Yeah, I didn’t buy the premise either, which is that we want our policemen to be nice.

Linda Hutchinson
Linda Hutchinson
1 year ago

It may well have – let’s just hope that they were all guilty.

Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
1 year ago

They probably weren’t. Every system is fallible. Hence the court of appeals.

Last edited 1 year ago by Aphrodite Rises
AC Harper
AH
AC Harper
1 year ago

And what *if* a degree of macho attitude is necessary to deal with criminals, who are mostly young violent men? If that is the case then pushing for a sex or gender blind police service would be counterproductive – unless you put the sensitivities of some women above actual policing.
So yes, allegations of sexual abuse need to be treated properly, and those found guilty suffer a penalty. But let’s not make that the be all and end all of police culture. Arresting malefactors comes first.

Chris Hume
CH
Chris Hume
1 year ago

Still, the impression one could be left with, having read Malton’s book, is that the vast majority of male police officers are exemplary, brave public servants. I don’t accept this version of events.

Ideologues rarely accept anything that undermines their worldview.

Bryan Dale
Bryan Dale
1 year ago

It’s not sexist for men to behave like men. What is sexist is demanding that they stop behaving like men or even start behaving like women. I believe men and women can and should work together, but that means both accepting the behavioural differences of the other.

Allison Barrows
AB
Allison Barrows
1 year ago
Reply to  Bryan Dale

Absolutely. Women on the force, the military, and even firefighting have much to contribute, but we are not physically strong enough to do the real heavy lifting. Analysis, communication, interrogation – we’re very proficient in these areas. But we’ve all seen video of female officers simply incapable of restraining a suspect, or having their weapons taken, or standing aside while their male colleagues do the rough stuff.
Men and women thrive as a symbiosis: my husband is the one who will climb a ladder three stories to rake snow off the roof; I’ll be there with homemade soup, a hot bath, and a Band of Brothers dvd at the ready when he comes down (provided I haven’t had to call an ambulance).

RJ Kent
RJ Kent
1 year ago

What a load of boarlocks. I worked at many London police stations 1978-2014 and the vast majority of cops, both male and female were decent people. Similarly with the civvies.

Samir Iker
Samir Iker
1 year ago
Reply to  RJ Kent

There was a black lady I know who decided to change jobs join the police (I suspect not as easy for a white man to suddenly “join the police”).

A few months later, while having tea with her in our house
1. She casually mentioned how she “knew” that she would face racism and sexism.
2. She also went through her actual experiences with policemen, and invariably they were polite and bent backward to help her ease in.

The latter somehow (and unsurprisingly) did not change her mind about the former.

What was also clear was the real reason women like her would feel harassed. In a short period, she had lost weight and looked tired.

Very obviously, police work even in training was tough compared to the comfy ob she had (which was also mostly women, incidentally).

But I am sure she would soon switch to a nice relaxing desk job in the police, while the “sexist” men alongside her could go on with the catching criminals bit.

Graham Strugnell
GS
Graham Strugnell
1 year ago

The anecdote about 10 p pieces and foreskins is ridiculous, as any man will know. It would be a struggle to keep one 10p there, and physically very painful. Also, the attempt of a non police officer to impugn the account of one who is reveals much about the author’s desire to twist the truth her way.

N Forster
NF
N Forster
1 year ago

Yep, struck me as a straightforward lie.

Andrew Dalton
Andrew Dalton
1 year ago

I’m not sure it’s clear that it was before the change in size of 10p pieces, either. It stretches credulity, among other things.

Andrew D
Andrew D
1 year ago

32 large coins! I know Julie B is a foreskin-dodger, but surely it must have occurred to her that this was a physical impossibility?

Simon Melville
SM
Simon Melville
1 year ago

Definitely heard that story before – not by the police but in a rugby club (if memory serves). Probably a FOAF? Unless the coppers also heard the same story as me and ill-advisedly thought to give it a go in real life.

JP Martin
JP Martin
1 year ago

Yes, this is not within her area of expertise.

Paul O
Paul O
1 year ago

Glad someone else thought the same. It saved me having to go around the house gathering up all the loose change to prove it was a lie.

Christian Moon
Christian Moon
1 year ago

The bigger question raised is whether lesbians’ disconnectedness from the wider shared world of men and women should disqualify them from roles like being a police constable.
So many of their views are inevitably the combination simply of fantasy and their own personal issues.

William Shaw
William Shaw
1 year ago

“the impression one could be left with, having read Malton’s book, is that the vast majority of male police officers are exemplary, brave public servants. I don’t accept this version of events.”
As usual, you believe the worst and only the parts that fit with your misandry.
No surprise.
As for “woman hating,” that’s a significant misunderstanding on your part. The reported comments from men may be insulting and shocking but I doubt there is much, if any, woman hating going on.

Last edited 1 year ago by William Shaw
Jorge Espinha
Jorge Espinha
1 year ago

Why do we pay for this?

Ben P
BP
Ben P
1 year ago
Reply to  Jorge Espinha

Why can’t we focus on the job they’re all supposed to do, which they’re not. ie preventing/dealing with crime.

Ben J
Ben J
1 year ago

* sigh*

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago

“Indeed, the College of Policing was this month compelled to issue a statement”
For goodness sake Julie, we’ve only just had Pride Month. Cottage of Policing if you please.

Ben J
Ben J
1 year ago

I see you changed the click-baity, misandrist title of the original piece.

Ludwig van Earwig
Ludwig van Earwig
1 year ago
Reply to  Ben J

Yes there seem to be more and more sensationalist titles on this site, as well as an excess of tendentious articles like this one. I doubt I’ll be subscribed for much longer unless there’s a change for the better.

Ludwig van Earwig
LV
Ludwig van Earwig
1 year ago

Male copper are rotters? What, all of them Julie?

Andrew McDonald
Andrew McDonald
1 year ago

Read the article for a simple and clear answer to your question. FTFY.

Ben P
Ben P
1 year ago

JUST ARREST CRIMINALS AND DO THE BEAT TO PREVENT CRIME

Alan Groff
Alan Groff
1 year ago

Odd article. People do horrible things, cops use their power to rape. People commit murder. But over 99% don’t, and are good people. This author blurs lines and implies men are the average of those groups and it’s systemic. The thinking isn’t just muddled, it’s harmful. Getting power by seeing victimhood everywhere is an insult to victims.

Benedict Waterson
BW
Benedict Waterson
1 year ago

Bindel is a monomaniac and a bore. She doesn’t have much to share except standard feminist cliches and widely held common sense views on ‘trans’..
If her prejudices about the intrinsic evil of men & ‘Patriarchy’ are not confirmed at all times, she becomes agitated and confused, and demands that they should be

Aaron James
Aaron James
1 year ago

It is easy to tear down, but then does it get built back up?

Graffiti Avenue
SA
Graffiti Avenue
1 year ago

I don’t think the police are Mancho or even sexist I see the modern police very silly & almost clown like & are more interested in dancing the Macarena in a pride event.When it comes too going after gangland criminals they seem too ignore them, like it’s not are problem beat & shot anyone at random we won’t get involved same with the,middle class student going around taking a hammer to the petrol station pumps.We live in society now we’re people get away with murder and the victim has no help at all.The courts are not in their favour when a crime against them happens.Police can not even search people now that they are deemed racist or it against His or Her human rights for Police just do what the law tell’s them.

Jorge Espinha
Jorge Espinha
1 year ago

Julie, I’m really really sorry for the terrible experiences you had with men. Any male can imagine the kind of violence we are capable of. I also know men that had negative experiences with women or that feel dismissed by them. These men developed a defensive and often misogynist reaction towards women. For them, women are all (you can fill in the blank it’s not nice). These men are wrong. You are wrong. I feel sorry for your poor experiences but, Julie I didn’t brutalise you. It’s not my fault.

Mark M Breza
MB
Mark M Breza
1 year ago

Was the feminist revolution all just so women can work the same bad jobs as men do !

Mickey Mouse
Mickey Mouse
1 year ago
Reply to  Mark M Breza

The ones who truly believe in equality, can be drafted in the next major war.

Christopher Barclay
Christopher Barclay
1 year ago

The Ripper investigation was not held back by because lead investigator George Oldfield believed that the prostitutes ‘deserved it’. It was held back because he believed that the Ripper was only interested in prostitutes and he therefore assumed that several attacks on women who weren’t prostitutes had not been committed by the Ripper. That and the inability of the police to handle huge volumes of information in a pre-computer age.

Rhys Jaggar
Rhys Jaggar
1 year ago

It’s amazing how dissonant my personal life experience has been compared to all these industries/sectors which are rife with misogyny. I’ve never seen misogyny once in a workplace and I’ve seen some absolutely disgusting careerist behaviour by women in that time as well.
I’ve been put under electronic surveillance by women who apparently can’t be leered at in retribution. I’ve had 27 year old women actively conspire with 40 year old women to try and force me out of employment. I’ve had a 27 year old woman refuse to answer to me, force me out of my job, take it over, then come shamelessly seeking free advice because they couldn’t do the job to the standard I did it. I drafted, but did not send, an email to my former chairman saying: ‘I am most uncomfortable saying ‘F**k off you obnoxious c**t’, it not being the language of business….’
I’ve seen a woman tell lecturers in business school that she had to get an A grade because she had been to Harvard and so knew everything about what an A grade was. That’s called cheating, for women that don’t know about these things. That same woman was then self-righteously implying that other people there needed to consider her opinions in matters they were not involved in, because women have a very shrewd understanding of how controlling others without their consent works.
I was told by a teenage woman that ‘You can’t be allowed to do medicine’, but apparently, nothing I say to them can have any effect on them. That is pure misandryst sexism and it’s high time that it was criminalised.
Thousands of sexist women would be prosecuted if their criminality were actually prosecuted…..
Here’s a list of things I’ve NEVER heard in my lifetime:

  1. Go and have babies, dear.
  2. Your tits are your biggest career asset.
  3. Wolf-whistling in the office.
  4. If you want to be promoted, suck my c**k, darling.

I’ve heard about plenty of office pairs illicitly bonking (not literally) and none of the women were anything but fully consenting enthusiastic participants. Several were screwing very senior men for career advancement. I’ve never once seen a 20 something man screwing a 45 year old female executive for preferment: EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, PLEASE!!

Clearly I need to go work on building sites, in the police, in medicine and in the City. Those places must be totally full of sexist, arrogant, prostitute-using masonic misogynists.

Kingsley Baconhausen
Kingsley Baconhausen
1 year ago

It always makes me laugh when conservatives ideologies get called out on this site and all of the usual suspects cry foul. Extreme right and extreme left are interchangeable at this point, and only serve to damage society. If you defend your tribe so blindly that blatant misogyny is excusable than you are no better than an entitled trans activist trying to normalize adult entertainers reading to children.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 year ago

You’re correct about the extreme-right being the extreme-left, but conservative ideologies are centre-right not extreme-right.

Betsy Arehart
Betsy Arehart
1 year ago
Reply to  Richard Craven

What is extreme right?

Jorge Espinha
Jorge Espinha
1 year ago
Reply to  Betsy Arehart

Whoever disagres with a leftist.