X Close

Has Fuccboi killed literature? Millennial authors are slaves to their egos

I can't even. (Fuccboi, Little Brown)


February 11, 2022   6 mins

By the drowsy standards of the undead American literary world, criticism of Fuccboi, the debut novel of 30-year-old Sean Thor Conroe, has been strangely polarised. The Washington Post hailed it as “its generation’s coming-of-age novel”; Gawker’s review, “More Like Suckboi,” claims that Fuccboi “captures nothing of our present moment”.

The novel may be a release from a major press (Little, Brown), but its author isn’t famous; nor is his offering — a fragmented piece of autofiction about a 30-year-old named Sean Thor Conroe writing a book called Fuccboi — particularly mass-market. So why the histrionics? Well, Conroe received a six-figure advance for this first novel.

Yet while such a sum will always raise eyebrows, especially envious ones, Conroe has been subjected to levels of vitriol unusual even for the literary “community”. The dope on Conroe circulating among the disgruntled (no six-figure advance) is as follows: Conroe is nothing less than a privileged, wealthy, white-passing impostor, who, Barry Lyndon-style, has passed himself off as a dejected, pitiable, impoverished victim of white supremacy (he’s half Japanese) and capitalism (he’s a former delivery boy). That is to say, he is the kind of wretch who passes as a literary idol for the publishing world’s exacting commissars.

For a time, the indie winds were in Conroe’s favour, and praise was doled out. But since that cheque — some wager, because of it — the tides have turned. In a post entitled “Fuck, Boy!”, Sam Pink, a writer and painter of working-class extraction, put his allegations bluntly: “[I’ve had] my entire work stolen from me.” To wit, Pink accused Conroe of swiping his telegraphic, slangy style — a blend of Soundcloud rap (“side bae”, “ex bae”, “editor bae”, “peripheral bae”, “autonomous bae”) and leaden Instagram self-care argot (“This sharing permitted, even encouraged, me to consider my own patterns./To even recognize, in the first place, that patterns were created by tangible actions”). Pink is disgusted by this “offensively appropriated” “fake slang from an ivy league kid.”

Conroe, predictably, claims to be speaking in his real voice. In his acknowledgments, Conroe writes:

Ty ty ty to Giancarlo DiTrapano for not only letting me write how I talk, but encouraging me to. 
            That shit there.
            Man.
            I can’t even.

For what it’s worth, Conroe does talk like that. I briefly met him when he attended a reading at my apartment, though he seemed uncomfortable and often stepped outside to smoke in the cold. As I later learned, two other guests were the respective publisher and author of an essay accusing Conroe of, basically, slumming it. The battle, as always, is about stolen victimhood, and the writers, as always, respond by punching up their “trauma” and playing down their “privilege” to stake a claim to what is, after all, an unimpressive and even grating style.

Authenticity aside, when Hanson O’Haver, in Gawker, dumps on Conroe’s use of “laundered rap slang” and Jonah Bromwich’s New York Times review includes a pro forma condemnation of the same as “cringeworthy”, one wonders: where have they been? Do they remember the Beatniks? Elvis? Norman Mailer’s “White Negro”? White and white-passing Americans appropriating African American slang is nothing new; what is new is skittishness to publish writing that does so. Surely, then, however unappealing you might find this hyper-contemporary style, his publisher deserves credit for taking on the political risk accompanying its use by a man not immediately identifiable as an oppressed racial minority (Conroe is, again, half Japanese).

Similarly, Fuccboi is admirably daring in its gestures toward political relevance: it’s easy to see why a publishing house would have thought this book relevant to today’s crisis of liberal masculinity. As our narrator puts it, “How tf was I privileged./I couldn’t do shit. Not only that, no one allowed me to show/admit I couldn’t.” He yearns to be “one of the good ones”; to seem “so woke and self-aware and self-deprecating about how dumb ideas of alpha-beta masculinity were”. Yet given the intense censoriousness of his “woke” circle, who accuse him of “getting lost in the men’s rights tunnel”, writing is his only “way to start tackling repression and shame” — to avoid becoming like a school shooter, or even Hitler.

Despite the title, he seems to be a pretty good guy (and pretty continent, too: only one act of fornication, in over 350 pages!). The worst things he does are listen to Joe Rogan, watch some “low-key red-pill videos”, very noncommittally question the reality of the gender pay gap, and equally casually say “bros over hoes”. The only slightly developed conservative thought is one regarding his relationship with his “ex bae”, where he reflects on her abortion: could anti-natalism perhaps be nihilistic? Could neoliberal feminism perhaps be careerist? Well, yeah. Ultimately, the “anti-woke” side of this book is so anodyne that one wonders whether Fuccboi, like the narrator’s pre-Fuccboi manuscript, may not have been a bit too edited-for-acceptability.

And yet I think this book is earnest. If anything, its issue is not a lack of authenticity, but a surfeit thereof. It will be obvious to those who finish it that Fuccboi is the genuine stream of consciousness of the author, spilled with little self-censorship onto the page. All of this is presented with what one hopes is an at least slightly satirical sense of self-important militancy, as when the narrator explodes to a perfectly polite stranger: “I’m tryna write for people who don’t read. Who don’t give a shit about books.”

The problem, then, isn’t that Conroe’s parents were rich (which I have no cause to believe is the case), or that he didn’t, as Pink claims, “earn” his audience by publishing online before getting the big deal. The problem is that this book, like so many others in its milieu, values “authenticity” and “realness” over more venerable criteria of literary value (depth, characterisation, plot). Fuccboi does accurately represent the cretinous depravity of the Millennial generation, as well as the self-aggrandising cult of martyrdom — increasingly by self-diagnosed mental or physical illness — with which my generation shirks the responsibilities historically incumbent upon the civilised mind. But though Fuccboi is playful and lively, often funny and sometimes moving, and certainly of its time, it does not fully succeed as a work of art.

The current crop of young writers is less ambitious and less accomplished even than the minimalists and dirty realists — Bret Easton Ellis, Raymond Carver, Denis Johnson, Amy Hempel — they are (likely unknowingly) imitating. In that earlier generation’s writing, the chaotic hedonism of the everyday attains emotional depth and significance; characters are complex and differentiated, and struggling to form complex and differentiated relationships with each other. They have more than names, characteristics, and the occasional impulse; they have feelings, thoughts, and sometimes, even, ideas.

But where there once was narrative that made life seem complicated, moving, and significant, indie literature today primarily comprises trite, essentially ecological descriptions of an already familiar scene, devoid of any coherence or meaning. Men write “stories” about men with their demographic characteristics doing cocaine/Adderall and displaying traits of narcissistic personality disorder; women write “stories” about women with their demographic characteristics doing ketamine/Klonopin and displaying traits of borderline personality disorder.

Both contingents write in a mode of blasé detachment that has become achingly stale. They are averse to or incapable of subjectivity and depth. What little allowance is made for human feeling is exclusively of pharmaceutical origin. These are not works of art; they are simply unremarkable descriptions of unremarkable lives.

In the glib generational determinism so popular today, one excuses this shallowness of character and failure to depict any interpersonal conflict as a “real” and “relatable” mirror of the “autism” of the young generation (indeed, this self-serving self-ID is so common that forums for the autistic and their caretakers use the acronym AA for “actually autistic”). However, these writers, and the thinly disguised stand-ins that populate their autofiction, are not autistic. They are merely permanent adolescents, incapable of empathising with any experience outside of their own and comfortably withdrawn into a profound egotism.

Similarly, one excuses their unambitious and unintelligible style by reference to the influence of “online” life on young minds. However, the more accurate explanation for this monotonous sea of uninspired cliché is that these writers do not read anyone except their friends, nor do they aspire to much readership beyond them. And that’s probably for the best: readers deserve better than for 20-somethings functionally addicted to psychotropics to describe their existence in turgid, unorganised prose. The generalised inability to execute the most basic fundamentals of modern narrative is not a product of an autistic or digital zeitgeist; it is a product of lazy and illiterate writers.

Does Fuccboi fall under this umbrella? For all its flaws, Conroe resists the suicidal renunciation of many of his peers. Perhaps this, in part, is why his coevals have so passionately denounced his novel as cringe: Conroe unapologetically does care about literature, in his own guileless and heartwarming way. Perhaps it sounds silly for him to talk about “That Art Life”; perhaps it feels awkward and uninformative to read his emails with Sheila Heti. But at least, unlike so many today, he believes that writing could serve a function beyond identity work or courtship, and at least expresses interest in authors outside of his immediate coterie.

In that sense, he is the exception. Of course, this nihilism is reflective of the current mood of the world. But its consequences are more severe: if our authors are as distracted and superficial as anybody else, and our literature as unnourishing as TikToks or memes or tweets, why on earth would anyone read? Much like the humanities’ wan retreat to the “digital humanities”, this attempt to stay relevant — I’m not a normal book, I’m a cool book! — will only doom the medium to total obsolescence.


Ann Manov is a writer living in New York. Visit her website here.

ann_manov

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

22 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Madeleine Jones
MJ
Madeleine Jones
2 years ago

This is a good article. I have no interest in reading, er… Fuccboi (charming!) but I am interested in approaches to literature outside of self-deprecation / stream of consciousness / “social critiques.” As a woman immersed in writing circles, especially of the so-called ‘literary’ kind, I’ve noticed how boring contemporary literature is. The firebrands (Houellbecq, Karl Ove Knausgaard) do not write in English, and although I’m happy to read a translation, it’s hard not to mourn the dire state of Anglosphere letters. Also, I love writing men. Willing to shout this from the top of the Matterhorn. It’s helped me understand complex men in my life and in history. I dislike the taboo against ‘men writing women.’
Another interesting point this article rose relates to autism and ‘mental health’ identities. A nasty result of our diagnosis-keen culture are individuals who believe their pain is exceptional, more sympathetic and deserving greater attention than others. I’ve been diagnosed with anxiety, Asperger’s, ADHD, depression and ‘low-self esteem disorder’ (Whatever that is). For a while, I believed no one could understand my pain, especially neurotypicals. I was wrong. Understanding that everyone hurts and life is not immune from suffering was a humbling experience. It actually made me a better sister, friend, daughter… and writer. The world isn’t divided into ‘neurotypicals / persecuted minority’ and ‘oppressors.’ Literature ought to assist us in navigating hardship, grief, suffering, peril.
Thanks for this article, Unherd.

Jon Redman
HJ
Jon Redman
2 years ago

It is frequently commented that men are no good at writing women, but it’s far less frequently noted that women are not much good at writing women either, nor indeed much good at writing men. Very few authors at all are capable of writing plausible children.
The usual manner of failure is that the character comes over as how the (fe)male writer assumes a (wo)man – or child – ought to think. So female-written male characters notice the female characters’ hair, clothes, and shoes, and male-written female characters notice what engine the male character’s car has, and want to shag all the time.
I’m not a writer, so I don’t get why this is so, but it is. Daisy in The Great Gatsby is really quite wooden for someone who’s in the best novel of the 20th century. Diana Flyte in Brideshead Revisited is just a version of Sebastian that Evelyn Waugh would have slept with.

J Bryant
JB
J Bryant
2 years ago

My knowledge of this book will likely never extend beyond what I learned in this article, but I’m certainly struck by the quality of the article: intelligent and incisive.
That seems to be the state of modern literary fiction (I’m assuming Fuccboi qualifies as literary–even if Conroe himself doesn’t recognize it as such). Few people read the books but they spawn endless discussion and scholarship. It appears to be more important to have read the leading commentators than the original authors.
Times are bad. Children no longer obey their parents, and everyone is writing a book.” — Marcus Tullius Cicero.

Jon Redman
Jon Redman
2 years ago
Reply to  J Bryant

I have often thought a good book review is one that either persuades you to read a book, or persuades you not to do so. This review does a good job of the latter, not because it’s a bad review, but because it’s a good review of what’s clearly an ar53-wipingly bad book.

Richard Parker
Richard Parker
2 years ago

May I second the first two comments on this article: it’s an excellent piece and a fine example of the sort of material that persuaded me to subscribe to Unherd.
To be honest, I have always enjoyed Esther Manov’s writing, and this piece was especially fulfilling to read. Thank you for publishing work by genuinely smart and interesting people such as she: it’s hard to find these days (as the essay itself notes).

R Wright
RW
R Wright
2 years ago

““side bae”, “ex bae”, “editor bae”, “peripheral bae”, “autonomous bae”
I’m not even 30 and these zoomers may as well be aliens to me.

Chris Mochan
CH
Chris Mochan
2 years ago

I think it’s telling that most of the media discussion around this book has been about the profile and background of the author. The merit or otherwise of the book is of secondary (if any) importance. What a reflection of the age of identity.

Lindsay S
LS
Lindsay S
2 years ago
Reply to  Chris Mochan

During all the BLM protests, a thing went around Facebook asking people to support Black authors by only buying their books and not books by white authors! My response was, if the book is good I’ll buy it regardless the colour of the authors skin! Who cares about the author beyond their ability to write when reading a book?
The literary world and the acting world are on the same slippery slope. This hysteria and gate keeping needs to end as it’s destroying creative freedoms which are needed to produce great works of art!

Drahcir Nevarc
RC
Drahcir Nevarc
2 years ago

Funnily enough, my Jacobean revenge tragedy The Senseless Counterfeit, which I wrote in 2015, features a character called Fucboi.

aaron david
AD
aaron david
2 years ago

I spent the nineties in the book trade, new and used, management and buyer, scout and counter help. And around once a year, one of the publishing houses would announce a major new talent, some child prodigy. And after the book fails to earn its advance, that author would quietly fade away. Only to be replaced by the next pretty young thing, figuratively. They are looking for the next Chuch Palanuik, Donna Tartt; someone thoughtful AND approachable. Most writers have nowhere near the skills people like that have accumulated.
I am not saying anything about the literary quality of this novel, as it isn’t something I would be interested in, but one always has to remember that literary tastes change, what the concepts of acceptable literature forms changes, and there are always going to be people pushing those boundaries. And the critics will fail to realize that what they want is not what the public wants. Which, frankly, is more SF and romance, which are the bread and butter of the publishing world, much to its horror.
Oh, and by the way, this is an excellent review. More, please!

Jonathan Nash
JN
Jonathan Nash
2 years ago

God this book sounds appalling, and the author and all his critics uneducated adolescents. I would be filled with despair, but I’m currently reading Olga Tokarczuk’s latest book to come out in English – The Books of Jacob – which reassures me that serious writing is still being done, albeit not it seems in the US.

Simon Diggins
SD
Simon Diggins
2 years ago

Good review: this book will never darken my bookshelves.

Warren T
WT
Warren T
2 years ago

Why is it that someone can be labeled half Japanese and yet not half African American?

Sally Owen
SO
Sally Owen
2 years ago

Thank you! A great article.

Terence Fitch
Terence Fitch
2 years ago

Love the absurd puffery of ‘this generation’. This generation, especially young men, don’t read fiction, let alone literary fiction. Why should they?

Ferrusian Gambit
SS
Ferrusian Gambit
2 years ago

Feels like this is a good example of Betteridge’s law of headlines.
I mean, of course, a whiny pretentious author I’d never heard of until clicking this link will plausibly kill stone cold dead an activity humans have partaken in one form or another since the invention of writing.

Koen Velazquez
Koen Velazquez
1 year ago

Very well presented. Every quote was awesome and thanks for sharing the content. Keep sharing and keep motivating others.

Juliet Gordon
Juliet Gordon
1 year ago

For the reason that the admin of this site is working, no uncertainty very quickly it will be renowned, due to its quality contents.

Jase Ponce
Jase Ponce
1 year ago

pret 500

Amya Barnes
Amya Barnes
1 year ago

Awesome! Its genuinely remarkable post, I have got much clear idea regarding from this post

Bail Process
Bail Process
1 year ago

You are so clever and candy.

Erica Perkins
Erica Perkins
1 year ago

I appreciate you sharing this blog post. Thanks Again. Cool.