X Close

What’s behind the Boris reshuffle? The sackings were inevitable but the appointments are intriguing

I reach for my gun. Dan Kitwood - WPA Pool/Getty

I reach for my gun. Dan Kitwood - WPA Pool/Getty


September 16, 2021   5 mins

“When I hear the word culture”, Josef Goebbels is supposed to have said, “I reach for my gun.” Boris Johnson, on the other hand, merely reaches for whoever he reckons will most rub the so-called metropolitan liberal elite up the wrong way.

One would have thought that Oliver Dowden was doing a fairly good job of pursuing the Government’s forever “war on woke”. But obviously not. The reshuffle saw Olive, as the former Statues (sorry, Culture) Secretary (now party co-Chairman) is known to his friends, summarily replaced by the preternaturally plain-speaking Nadine Dorries. She was known by her enemies as the woman who once suggested equal marriage was something which only “metro elite gay activists” aspired to and called Messrs Cameron and Osborne “two posh boys who don’t know the price of milk”.

Whether Ms Dorries, before accepting his commission, quizzed Mr Johnson on precisely how much he paid when he last popped out for a pint of semi-skimmed is, sadly, not recorded, although, if precedent is anything to go by, we will eventually find out. Indeed, many of the most delicious moments in contemporary histories of recent premierships are provided by their accounts of the often cack-handed attempts of their hapless heroes to inject fresh blood and get rid of dead wood.

Advertisements

Normally, it’s the sackings that afford the most entertainment: May’s “elder sister” slaying of George Osborne is an absolute classic of the genre — not least because it came back to bite her big time when the former Chancellor became editor of the Evening Standard, from which perch he took great delight in proving that revenge is indeed a dish best served cold (and, in his case, that meant very, very cold indeed).

This time around, however, it’s the appointments that are more intriguing. In part, that’s because the reshuffle’s two most obvious victims were (a) long-destined for the chop and (b) not particularly interesting or heavyweight politicians.

It would be hard, for instance, to find many people sad to see Gavin Williamson depart Education after what teachers, students and pupils (not to mention their parents) have been put through during the pandemic. And the now-former Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Robert Jenrick (cruelly dubbed “Robert Generic” by his detractors), was better known for bending lockdown rules, greenlighting a Tory donor’s questionable construction project, bunging big grants to towns with Tory MPs, and going on telly to defend the indefensible than he was for building more houses.

Their replacements, however, are rather more interesting. Nadhim Zahawi will, of course, be criticised for having no direct experience of state schooling, but may well be given the benefit of the doubt, at least initially, as a result of his impressive performance as Vaccines Minister and because he’s that most unusual of top Tories – someone with a BSc (Chemical Engineering, UCL) rather than an Oxford PPE.

Even more interesting, is Michael Gove’s move to MHCLG. This is not a ministry normally given to a big-hitter with a reputation (at least among civil servants) for competence as well as the ability to present a parliamentary and Cabinet case.

His appointment suggests – encouragingly – that Johnson realises that he can’t merely give up fundamental planning reform as a bad job and hope the problem goes away. And, while it may be true (Gove’s many fans would even say tragic) that his neo-con worldview and concerns about his reliability (perhaps expressed most shockingly and openly a few years ago by Defence Secretary Ben Wallace) mean Gove is unlikely ever to be awarded one of the great offices of state (Chancellor, Home Secretary, Foreign Secretary), his decision to accept the challenge — which apparently includes converting the PM’s “levelling up” rhetoric into reality – is nonetheless significant.

The test, of course, will be whether he can achieve anything without simultaneously losing friends and alienating people (including voters) – a test he clearly flunked when he was Cameron’s controversial Education Secretary.

But if Gove is something of an ideologue, he has nothing, at least on that score, on Liz Truss, the new Foreign Secretary — the first Conservative woman (and only the second woman ever) to occupy that post. And in some ways that (plus the fact that the Tory grassroots’ favourite free-market zealot was seen by those who get off on Global Britain as having done well in the International Trade brief) may be half the point.

At the FCDO, Truss has effectively been parked somewhere where her Britannia Unchained, Singapore-on-Thames shtick isn’t going to interfere too much with Boris Johnson’s rather more pragmatic, interventionist, and supposedly One Nation brand of Toryism. Meanwhile, her replacement at DIT, Brexity former International Development Minister, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, is seen as a reasonably safe pair of hands, although without Truss’s infamous flair for publicity. That said, anyone (can there still be anyone?) dreaming of a trade deal with China on her watch might be well advised invest their hopes elsewhere.

Truss replaces Dominic Raab – surely the most high-profile casualty of this reshuffle, which may seem like an odd thing to say about the new Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor after he was compensated with the formal title of Deputy Prime Minister. But let’s be honest: Franklin Roosevelt’s Veep, “Cactus Jack” Garner famously dismissed the vice presidency as “not worth a bucket of warm piss”; well, whatever is worth less than warm piss, that’s basically what the office of DPM is worth.

He knows it. Johnson knows it. We all know it. The fact that he was offered it at all is testimony only to the fact that, unlike some of the others who were demoted (Williamson, Jenrik, former Justice Secretary Robert Buckland and the Boris-uber-loyalist, former co-Chairman, Amanda Milling) No 10 couldn’t be entirely sure that Raab would go quietly – or, indeed, remain relatively quiet on the backbenches in the hope of a return to government (or, more likely, a seat in the Lords) in years to come.

Quite what Raab’s fellow lawyers will make of him, however, will be interesting to see. There would seem to be little chance of him going native – he was after all the first Tory during the 2019 leadership contest to promote proroguing parliament as a route out of what was then the Brexit impasse. If anything, they may want to buckle up for a bumpy ride: Raab’s combination of natural aggression and neoliberalism means he may be far more inclined than his predecessor to pick a fight with what he’ll no doubt see as the sector’s “producer groups”.

In the end, however, although we’re bound to be distracted by who’s up and who’s down, perhaps we should pay more attention to three politicians who have stuck around. Priti Patel clearly remains too totemic to shift from the Home Office: even if she can’t stop those migrants coming across the Channel in small boats she can bang on about them like no-one else, helping to ensure no space opens up on the Conservatives’ flank for a post-Farage populist right. David Frost is still what passes for the PM’s brain on Brexit. And Rishi Sunak is not just too popular to move; his reputation as a fiscal hawk (doubtless something he’ll burnish this autumn) also provides some much needed reassurance to the party’s bog-standard backbench Thatcherites that Johnson, for all his strengths as an election-winner, hasn’t led the Tories entirely off the small-state straight and narrow.


Tim Bale is Professor of Politics at Queen Mary University of London and Director of the Mile End Institute.

ProfTimBale

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John K
John K
2 years ago

The only saving grace in this sea of incompetence and half-decent mediocrity is the realisation that the alternative is even worse.

Can you imagine a government of Starmer, Abbot, Rayner and co? Too horrible to contemplate.

Margaret Tudeau-Clayton
Margaret Tudeau-Clayton
2 years ago
Reply to  John K

Something is, however, going on in the Labour Party which I wish someone at Unherd would take up: there have been resignations and changes which are apprently linked to conflict sover trans gender issues (and perhaps more generally ‘woke’ culture): https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/sep/14/labour-shadow-equalities-secretary-quits-minister-marsha-de-cordova?utm_term=200740d17d4f966fff2e08be6159fb66&utm_campaign=GuardianTodayUK&utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&CMP=GTUK_email

Alan Thorpe
Alan Thorpe
2 years ago

It really doesn’t matter who is PM or in the cabinet because effectively we have had the same useless, lying governments since Blair took over.

David Simpson
David Simpson
2 years ago
Reply to  Alan Thorpe

I think you possibly mean civil service

Jean Nutley
JN
Jean Nutley
2 years ago
Reply to  David Simpson

Aah! good point, well made.

Andrew Sainsbury
Andrew Sainsbury
2 years ago

Having a narrow choice of party MPs to take extremely short contracts at senior executive level in anything mildly important is an absolutely ludicrous way to operate. This system is all about maintaining imaginary roles for our wannabe aristocracy – it has nothing to do with good management, democracy or even common sense. The cost to our nation in the modern era must have beeen catastrophic.

D Hockley
D Hockley
2 years ago

If Johnson had any true grit then he would have sacked himself.

David Simpson
David Simpson
2 years ago
Reply to  D Hockley

but who would he have replaced himself with? Who is there?

Last edited 2 years ago by David Simpson
D Hockley
D Hockley
2 years ago
Reply to  David Simpson

I was thinking more along the lines of:

He can’t sack himself because he is not in charge; Carrie Symonds is.

Last edited 2 years ago by D Hockley
Charles Lawton
CL
Charles Lawton
2 years ago

i am surprised Patel is still there, yes she makes the right wing press ecsatic with her pronouncements but nothing she does changes anything, total windbag.

Sharon Overy
SO
Sharon Overy
2 years ago
Reply to  Charles Lawton

I think it’s the Home Office (un)civil servants that keep blocking her efforts. I doubt anyone else would keep doggedly trying to make them do their actual jobs, most would give up in despair.

David Simpson
David Simpson
2 years ago
Reply to  Charles Lawton

I think she’s actually not very bright. I saw her at a hustings in her first election and was deeply unimpressed. But I think she’s also quite tough, and brave

John K
John K
2 years ago

And on a point of pedantry, the quote is from a play by Hanns Johst – “When I hear the word culture …, I release the safety on my Browning!”Hanns Johst – Wikipedia

Jerry Mee-Crowbin
JM
Jerry Mee-Crowbin
2 years ago
Reply to  John K

I’m fairly sure that it was Goring who said ‘When I hear the word democracy I reach for my gun.’ Sounds are credible to me. I can’t think that Goebbels didn’t enjoy culture, especially as a hanger-on to a lover of Wagner.

Jim Richards
JR
Jim Richards
2 years ago
Reply to  John K

Thank you. You got there before me. Though it’s always a tricky one to correct as it can sound like you’re defending Goebbels

Charles Lawton
Charles Lawton
2 years ago

Working in the property industry, I can see why Gove was sent there. Jenrick was lucky not to end up in Court for corruption over the decision to consent a development by a Tory donor to avoid an increased Community Infrastructure Levy. Gove is one of the few who could sort out complexities of the planning system, that has been tinkered with by many people over the last 20 years, whether he manages to do it is an interesting question.

AC Harper
AC Harper
2 years ago
Reply to  Charles Lawton

Any Minister who comes close to ‘sorting out’ Spanish practices becomes instantly un-liked and criticised by those who lose their ‘perks’. Gove was willing to sort out Education but got side-lined by pressure from the Blob. I predict it will be the same for his new role… except the property industry does not attract the same adulation, so he may just achieve something after all.

Ri Bradach
RB
Ri Bradach
2 years ago

Getting a little bored of the failed Guardian writers that dominate UnHerd.

If I wanted to read petulant lines like “seen by those who get off on Global Britain” I’d read the Guardian for free rather than pay for an UnHerd subscription.

Perhaps I am being unfair: there are some genuinely good writers at the Guardian who wouldn’t sink to such infantile dribble as that.

I’m happy to have my views challenged by opposing perspectives, but I thought the idea was to have lots of those.

Get that back or lose this subscriber.

Last edited 2 years ago by Ri Bradach
Naren Savani
Naren Savani
2 years ago
Reply to  Ri Bradach

Well said. These minor and petulant academics are rather boring.

Jean Nutley
JN
Jean Nutley
2 years ago

Where have all the statesmen gone? Where are all the politicians that solidly knew their craft, their limitations and more importantly spoke pout for what they genuinely believed in, whatever their political allegiance? This current mob are still wet behind the ears, and twice as daft.

Cheryl Jones
Cheryl Jones
2 years ago
Reply to  Jean Nutley

I think the media has a lot to do with it. The Tony Blair arose in the shadow of 24×7 media and style over substance became the norm. Modern politicians (need to) care too much about media headlines, which can be artificially inflated by the media depending on their own agenda, whether it’s ideology, circulation, or both. Once they come gumming for you, eventually you’re toast, but as Brexit and 2029 show, the public are starting to cotton on. The media is NOT the public, and politicians had better start realising that. When Boris became PM and before the pandemic, Boris started bypassing the Beeb and Sky and Channel 4 by doing Ask the PM broadcasts on YouTube. Going direct. No way to be ‘misquoted’ by the press. I thought this was smart and shows Boris has an instinct for politics he is not given enough credit for. I also think the proportion of politicians who’ve had ‘proper jobs’ or who have come from a working class background has massively shrunk in recent years, particularly in the Labour Party, alongside a similar shrinking in the ‘gentleman politicians’ of old, who came from the aristocracy but who went into public service with a sense of ‘noblesse oblige’. Those men cane from a time when a university education actually meant something and grew out of a tradition of sharp debating skills, a classical education and a Victorian notions of duty and service to the realm.
That’s my take on it anyway.