X Close

When you get online – get paranoid

Credit; Patrick Lux/Getty


April 17, 2019   4 mins

Stop thinking like a good, law-abiding citizen. Whatever you know about technology, forget it. If you want to stay safe online, you need to start thinking like a hacker. And hackers are more paranoid about digital technology than anyone else in the world. Because they know, better than the rest of us, about all the dangers out there.

There’s no point sugar-coating it: a computer is a portal to a very dangerous world. You can’t see cyber-crime. It happens on screens behind closed doors. Most victims don’t report it to the police. Many are embarrassed to even tell relatives.

But crime has completely transformed over the last decade. A touch under half of the crimes that people in the UK fall victim to are committed over the internet. Online fraud is now the most common crime in the country. Your social media accounts are as likely to be burgled as your house. You are more likely to be hit by a computer virus than all forms of violent crime put together.

Advertisements

Crime on the internet – like anything on the internet – traverses borders effortlessly. But law enforcement doesn’t. You’re more likely to be victimised by someone on the other side of the world than across the street, and your local police force will struggle to get that person into a courtroom – assuming they can find the perp in the first place.

Any hacker worth their salt knows all this. And they know that there is only one person  responsible for their online safety. Not the tech giants, not police forces, not their banks. They can rely only on themselves – and there’s a phrase they use when they think about keeping safe. The phrase is ‘OPSEC’ – or operations security.

OPSEC isn’t rocket science. You don’t need to be a computer genius; you don’t need to know how to code. It’s a mentality that acknowledges there are bad actors out there. It sees every action that you take online as having implications for your security, it urges you to think systematically about them, and tells you to use countermeasures.

OPSEC is your online footprint – it reaches from the furthest corners of the internet to the devices that you use and takes into account the things that you do every day. This is your ‘attack surface’; this is where you are vulnerable. You must do hostile reconnaissance on it to discover what you have left for others to exploit.

So step one is to see if any information has already been leaked, hacked or dumped about you over the years that you’ve been online. Visit the website www.haveibeenpwned.comwhich allows you to type in your email or account information to check if you’ve been caught up in any of the umpteen data breaches that have happened over the last few decades, often without companies either telling you about them or even knowing about it themselves.

Then, try to put all the open source information that exists about you into a single picture. Visit pipl.com and type your own name in. There you will find all the information about you that’s freely available in the public records. Carry out targeted Google searches for your bank account number, telephone number, specific address, national insurance number. All of these can be put together to begin to take your identity away from you. Check your social media to see if there any password unlock clues there – your eye colour, a pet’s name, your mother’s maiden name. Compile a dossier. If you didn’t find a lot – great. If you did, visit each source to see what you can remove.

Then visit Clearscore by Equifax and check who’s looking at your credit history. Someone you don’t recognise? It might be that they’re scanning identities to see who’s alive. It’s not proof you’re being targeted, but they are like small calling cards, indications that a threat might exist.

Check your devices and networks. Anything connected to your home network can be compromised. What in your house is connected to the internet? Do these devices (Alexa; telly; heating system and so on) have default passwords? If so, change them.

Do you use a router? Update its firmware. If you don’t use a firewall on your computer, get one or enable it. If you don’t use a VPN to connect to the Internet, look it up and buy one today.

If you don’t use two-factor-authentication for your accounts, then you are asking for trouble. Check and install it. New flaws are found all the time in all the software that you use. Keeping them all updated and patched is absolutely vital.

The most important part of OPSEC, however, is behaviour – what you actually do with your computer. And your riskiest behaviour will be how you handle your passwords. If it’s a recognisable word, why are you even bothering. If you use the same password across a number of different platforms, change it. If you have passwords stored in browsers, they can be got at. If you are trying to remember all your passwords, you won’t be able to.

This brings me to a general rule of OPSEC: the most convenient option is never going to be the safest. So you, like many hackers, need to take your most private parts of your life out of the digital realm. The most important piece of technology to keep your passwords secure? The humble notebook. Write each of your passwords in the notebook, and use a cypher so if it is stolen, it is useless.

Meanwhile, stay vigilant. A lot of hacking is what is known as ‘social engineering’. This isn’t about fooling your device, it’s about fooling you. An email from your ‘boss’ that gets you to click a link. A mailed USB stick that you plug into your computer. A telephone call from your ‘bank’ that causes you to reveal account information.

OPSEC begins with a simple ABC: Assume Nothing. Believe No-one. Check everything. It’s a way of turning the deep, lurking, unknown dangers of the digital world into ones which are understood, measured and mitigated against. There is, remember, no such thing as being completely safe. Nothing and no one is completely un-hackable. But you really can make yourself a more difficult target.

With all the debate now erupting about government regulation, about the role of the tech giants, fines for harmful content and likely new laws to criminalise certain activity, don’t rely on the big institutions that surround you to keep you safe. Remember that you, yourself, remain the best layer of defence against the threats of the digital world. All it takes is a bit of healthy paranoia.


Carl is the co-founder and Research Director of the Centre for the Analysis of Social Media at Demos and author of The Death of the Gods: The New Global Power Grab, out on 23rd August in hardback from William Heinemann. You can read more of Carl’s work at www.carlmiller.co.

carljackmiller

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Whittock
Michael Whittock
3 years ago

The problem with our bishops and other church leaders is that they only cover half the ground. They can be counted on to pronounce blandly about peace,unity,social justice and Dominic Cummings because they know they are on safe ground. The liberal establishment will love them for it if they have bothered to take any notice.
The other half of the socio-political landscape is hard and dangerous terrain full of jagged rocks and hidden hazards. The prophet Jeremiah of the Old Testament knew it well. At a time of national emergency he was in a minority of one. The Kingdom of Judah and its capital,Jerusalem, was threatened by the mighty armies of Babylon. The political and religious establishment preached complacency. They said God wouldn’t allow His people and Temple to be destroyed. Jeremiah replied that on the contrary the invaders were going to be used by God to bring His judgement upon their sin and idolatry. Jeremiah sought to be true to what God was communicating in this catastrophic event and suffered for it.
Jesus ranged over similar territory. He did indeed speak harsh words to the establishment. But He also had words of warning and judgement for the whole of society. He accused it of being a “wicked and adulterous generation” (Matthew12.39) and an “unbelieving and perverse generation” (Matthew 17.17). He pronounced harsh judgement on some communities well known to Him because of their unresponsiveness.(Matthew 11.20-24)
I have to ask the question is not this how God sees our present generation? Is not the calling of the bishops and all ministers of the Church to ask it, and to draw some conclusions about the godless path our nation has taken and what we all need to do about it before it’s too late. That would be bravery indeed.
Quotes from the New International Version of the Bible.

Kelly Mitchell
Kelly Mitchell
3 years ago

Hmm – 2 articles that don’t actually explain what happened.
time to unsub from this NL?

Adrian Smith
Adrian Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Kelly Mitchell

I think it explains a lot why so few care that Christian churches remain closed and never get a mention in road maps back to the new normal. If the church ad more people who spoke out like Giles maybe more would want to go to church.

Adrian Smith
AS
Adrian Smith
3 years ago

I think test and trace is nothing more than a gimmick antidote to the “fear of R” that is replacing fear of death. I know of one healthcare professional who signed up to become a tracer, did the training and resigned in disgust at how poorly thought out and unprofessional the whole thing was. There will be plenty who don’t download the app at all and then there will be a growing number who have but leave their bluetooth off unless they actually want to use it. I don’t even have a smart phone, because I don’t like them – I certainly won’t be rushing out to buy one to download the app.

A lot of glib statements get made about empty beds in hospitals, however there were growing hot spots in cities and the pinch points were not beds, but specialist staff (many of who were going off sick or isolating because their partner had symptoms) and oxygen – not the supply but the evaporators that turn it from the liquid it is stored in into a breathable temperature gas. Evaporators were hitting design capacity and tripping out – there would have been no easy fix had more capacity been needed. The effects of lockdown came pretty well in the nick of time, much longer and the scenes could have been worse than New York and Italy as their health services crumbled. I have no doubt that had we not locked down about when we did we would have ended up locking down in panic before Easter and then we would have had a horrendous few weeks, while many in their 40’s and 50’s who recovered with treatment would have died without it.

The key thing now is to come out of lockdown much more quickly, but we have a government that has lost the initiative and a MSM scare and scandal mongering whilst pretending to really care.

Paul Harries
Paul Harries
3 years ago

Thank you Giles. I am not a Christian, but if I were to become one, it would be through your inspiration rather than the unnecessary tweets of bishops.

Peter KE
Peter KE
3 years ago

Maybe our bishops should be reminded that they have given up on the congregations and the people by insisting our churches are closed. We should now be hearing stronger voices advocating the reopening of places of worship. We must remember the government is acting on pseudo science and much of what has been done by the government is highly questionable. Let’s get churches open.

Peter KE
Peter KE
3 years ago

Do our legislators have the stomach for dealing with fake news be it the bbc or twitter. Maybe they could show themselves as having some real merit in ensuring the generation and perpetuation of fake news is truly punished with unlimited financial penalties, say 500% of gross turnover.

Iliya Kuryakin
Iliya Kuryakin
3 years ago

All true. And now Trump has called their bluff by formally questioning if they are platforms for communicating views or publishers, acting as editors, and thus liable for their content. Delicious.

Peter KE
Peter KE
3 years ago

I like the story. Maybe our bishops should push for restoring Whitsun and remove the May holiday. The bishops could show their worth.

robertbutterwick
robertbutterwick
3 years ago

Luke 6:37 Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.
Enough said.

robertbutterwick
robertbutterwick
3 years ago

The first time SAGE met to specifically discuss Covid19 was Jan 22nd. Presumably it was convened at the direction of the National Security Council chaired by Mark Sidwell. By Feb 4th SAGE realised that the testing capacity within the UK would be unable to cope, but took no specific actions to correct this. On March 16th the WHO told the World it needed to Test, test, test. At the SAGE meeting ON THE SAME DAY:

19. SAGE highlighted the critical importance of scaling up antibody serology and diagnostic
testing to managing the epidemic. A solution is urgently required, with a plan for
implementation.
20. Antibody testing is particularly vital to address the central unknown question of the ratio
of asymptomatic to symptomatic cases.
21. PHE explained how testing is being scaled up over the coming weeks to 10,000 per day
““ focused on intensive care units, hospital admissions and key workers.
22. PHE is urgently assessing commercial self-test options, with accuracy a key criterion.
ACTION: PHE to update SAGE on the efficacy and feasibility of rolling out a rapid home
swab test for antigens, including the mechanism for collection (for next meeting).
ACTION: PHE to develop a proposal for ramping up antibody serology and diagnostic
testing capacity, seeking input from DSTL and the National Laboratories Alliance

Yesterday when Jonathan Van Tam was asked where the estimated 8000 daily new infections were coming from his reply was ‘we don’t know’.

The essay is 100% correct. “…politicians were never in charge of this anyway” but our Scientists are clearly not as ‘in charge’ of this as they should be.

The public inquiry will be fascinating. The outpouring of hate and witch hunting over the last couple of weeks will not be forgotten.

bernfern1
bernfern1
3 years ago

The word bully implies a power differential which does not seem to apply here .Bishops are small fry in Cummings world .I did not discern mob spirit in their letters nor pharisaical self-righteousness or glee … only advocacy , a deep concern about the impact of the behaviour of leadership on the well-being of the population ( which as it turns out was well founded ) empathy for the lament of the people who felt betrayed in their grief – which had been mitigated by a sense of collective responsibility and suffering before Cummings acted independently . In this context I do not feel there has been an overreaction or an overstatement by the bishops . Requiring accountability is not punishment , neither is discernment judgement . I was grateful they spoke out and , in my view , released goodness and integrity over this whole mess ..God knows we need voices like that .